Year, league, league position, comment 4-5; L2; 9th 5-6; L2; 14th; 6-7; L2; 9th; KH appointed full time manager 3/1/7 7-8; L2; 5th; Lost in play-off final 8-9; L2; 6th; Lost in play-off semi-final 9-10; L2; 3rd; promoted 10-11; L1; 9th; highest ever league position at the time 11-12; L1; 24th; KH left for Barnsley before season started. Outcome - relegated 12-13; L2; 12th KH returns 28/1/13 13-14; L2; 3rd; promoted 14-15; L1; 8th NEW highest ever league position at the time 15-16; L1; 10th 16-17; L1; 9th (still in play-off race on last day of the season) I'm really not sure what your OP was getting at. You can clearly see above the affect of "with" and "without" KH and even some trends. We almost made the play-offs last year. The higher we climb the totem the more our players will appear on the radar of clubs above us and/or with deeper pockets so we will lose good players (Lund, NML, Allen) We have a youth system which is the envy of some Premiership clubs and a conveyor belt of talent coming through the ranks at the club to offset the above attrition. Has he taken us as far as he can? After looking what he has put in place and achieved in the last 10 years you'd be hard pushed to say he has when a few better results could have seen us make the play-offs last year. We've lost a few key players, had to integrate some new players into the squad and been behind the 8 ball with injuries, illnesses and some self-inflicted suspensions. After 6 games our league position doesn't look good. Does that mean KH has taken us as far as he can? I'd say it means we have started below the standards he has set for the club for the reasons put forward and maybe others too, but I would suggest the only glass ceiling in place is in your imagination. That record deserves respect when stood alone - when backed by our budget it is borderline miraculous. Keith Hill hasn't given up on the team and there should be no giving up on him. Be careful what you wish for! [Post edited 11 Sep 2017 13:27]
| |