| £45m deal for siggy agreed? 19:56 - Aug 15 with 21681 views | forkbeard |
| | | |  |
| £45m deal for siggy agreed? on 19:56 - Aug 15 with 11355 views | Jackfath |
Up to £45M? I thought we were at that point a few weeks ago? | |
| |
| £45m deal for siggy agreed? on 19:57 - Aug 15 with 11342 views | airedale |
Oh, are we selling Gylfi then? I'll miss him. | | | |
| £45m deal for siggy agreed? on 20:02 - Aug 15 with 11274 views | union_jack |
Yep, but let's not complain eh?
Let's hope this is it now and put it to bed. We can all then bitch about who we are going to buy. Or not if course1 | |
| |
| £45m deal for siggy agreed? on 20:04 - Aug 15 with 11232 views | max936 |
Up to 45 be fuked we could have accepted that weeks ago ffs, so we've been held back by holding out for 50 mill and now we cave in after all, all this time has been utterly WASTED behind the scenes we're still fuking amateurs fuking hell. | |
| |
| £45m deal for siggy agreed? on 20:05 - Aug 15 with 11205 views | Jackfath |
The world is laughing at us. | |
| |
| £45m deal for siggy agreed? on 20:08 - Aug 15 with 11159 views | exiledclaseboy |
So we stuck to our valuation guns for so long and now (if this is true) we've settled for the same deal we could have had three weeks ago.
Outstanding business smarts on display here. | |
| |
| £45m deal for siggy agreed? on 20:09 - Aug 15 with 11123 views | MrSwerve |
Shouldn't it say that WE have 'finally' accepted, given that Everton won't cough up the 50?
What a farce. | |
| |
| £45m deal for siggy agreed? on 20:09 - Aug 15 with 11117 views | union_jack |
The other option is to continue with our destructive stubbornness. If this was the only way then let's swallow our pride. We have to work 24/7 until the end of the month to make sure we get all our signings over the line in time. | |
| |
| £45m deal for siggy agreed? on 20:10 - Aug 15 with 11082 views | Tummer_from_Texas |
We were, 45M up front with no add ons. Then Everton changed their mind and wanted to renegotiate. | |
| |
| £45m deal for siggy agreed? on 20:10 - Aug 15 with 11077 views | E20Jack |
I heard earlier it was £40m up front and two sets of performance related add ons at £2.5m each. Whether that is the case I don't know.
But looks like £36m up front after Spurs take their cut is what we will be left with. | |
| |
| £45m deal for siggy agreed? on 20:11 - Aug 15 with 11072 views | Swanjaxs |
Is anybody surprised though, its been one clusterfùck after another! | |
| |
| £45m deal for siggy agreed? on 20:11 - Aug 15 with 11053 views | Oldjack |
Obviously all is not what it seems if we are to believe rumours and i'll only believe it when the money grabbing Icelander is holding up a shyte shirt | |
| Prosser the Tosser dwells on Phil's bum hole like a rusty old hemorrhoid ,fact
You Greedy Bastards Get Out Of OUR Club!
|
| |
| £45m deal for siggy agreed? on 20:11 - Aug 15 with 11053 views | icecoldjack |
We were, now we're working backwards ! it's the Swansea way. | | | |
| £45m deal for siggy agreed? on 20:11 - Aug 15 with 11043 views | Johnw102 |
And been paying him £80k a week! Says upto £45mill so what 40plus add ons. | |
| Never knew getting old would happen so quick! |
| |
| £45m deal for siggy agreed? on 20:12 - Aug 15 with 11041 views | KGriz16 |
Thank God, it's nearly done! Let's move on... | | | |
| £45m deal for siggy agreed? on 20:13 - Aug 15 with 10993 views | londonlisa2001 |
It's possible the add ons are significantly more realistic than previously was the case, so it's actually a true £45m rather than £40m.
Whatever. Thank God if it's true. | | | |
| £45m deal for siggy agreed? on 20:14 - Aug 15 with 10948 views | Jackfath |
Just to let posters know, there's no such thing as "God". | |
| |
| £45m deal for siggy agreed? on 20:15 - Aug 15 with 10906 views | nantywatcher |
Quite amateurish, we tried being smartarses and got caught out. We were auctioning an item with only one bidder stood in the auction hall, so we were no position whatsoever to negotiate. I'm sorry to wind people up, but I'm convinced if HJ had been in charge of the negotiating the deal would have been put to bed a month ago. Hopefully the new owners will now realise they're not as sharp as they thought they were. Mind you this story could be yet another fairy tale. | | | |
| £45m deal for siggy agreed? on 20:15 - Aug 15 with 10903 views | icecoldjack |
Most clubs will be thinking "right lads it's almost the end of the window, which means they need to meet our offer or fook off and we get to keep a good player" but us it seems think of it different!
Huw " Jeez, times cracking on here, better start lowering our valuation in case Everton decide they don't want him anymore"
It honestly defies any kind of logic in us waiting for 3 weeks to sell Gylfi for a fee we already apparently turned down weeks ago, the economy of the club must be well and truly fooked.
Maybe the trust got involved and told huw they must sell ?? | | | |
| £45m deal for siggy agreed? on 20:16 - Aug 15 with 10900 views | Smellyplumz |
Warra complete waste of time. | |
|
""Although I cannot promise or predict the future, I can guarantee one thing - the current board of directors will always fight, as we have done over the last 12 years, to work together as one with the Supporters Trust to make 100% sure that Swansea City football club remains the number one priority in all our thoughts and in every decision we make." | | Poll: | Huw Jenkins |
| |
| £45m deal for siggy agreed? on 20:16 - Aug 15 with 10896 views | union_jack |
Amen to that! | |
| |
| £45m deal for siggy agreed? on 20:18 - Aug 15 with 10839 views | icecoldjack |
Your right , siggy would have been sold a month ago..for £25 m | | | |
| £45m deal for siggy agreed? (n/t) on 20:19 - Aug 15 with 10760 views | Flashberryjack |
That's what I heard, and would explain the impasse. [Post edited 15 Aug 2017 20:23]
| |
| |
| £45m deal for siggy agreed? (n/t) on 20:19 - Aug 15 with 10760 views | Flashberryjack |
| |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
