By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions. We in turn value your personal details in accordance with our Privacy Policy.
Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
If anyone has found any evidence at all to support the notion that carbon fuel fires can cause simultaneous truss failure, even in floors well beneath the demolition wave, then you're welcome to show me. Until then, you should stop talking about what is plausible and what is not. Especially when accomplished commercial architects such as Richard Gage have raised serious doubts about anything other than controlled demolition. Did you know that the current managing architect of the Sydney Opera House, whose father was the designer, is a member of Architects and Engineers for 911 Truth? They are not the tin foil types that you imagine.
1
9/11 unanswered questions on 20:38 - Mar 27 with 2137 views
Having worked in the construction industry as a steel erector! Could you please explain to me how you facilitate the required partial demolition of concrete shuttered-moldings, wall and floor paneling to expose bare steel RSJ/girder trusses without getting any attention whatsoever from World Trace Centre employees?
Where would you have put all the debris? Where would you have hidden the skips and replacement materials required of which in my personal experience always ends (at some stage!) up outside in full view of the general public? Cos that's the only place it can go! Hint! Hint!
[Post edited 27 Mar 2016 20:48]
Argus!
0
9/11 unanswered questions on 20:42 - Mar 27 with 2118 views
Much of this debris was witnessed by people who had worked inside the buildings. By the way, if you haven't watched the testimony of William Rodriguez who worked in the WTC as a custodian for 22 years prior to 911 and was a decorated 911 hero, as he was helping the firefighters up the buildings, as he was one of two individuals having a master key, you should begin by watching that. He said that he was in one of the basements when there was a huge explosion in the sub-basements and that several of the people he personally knew -- he even named a few of them -- had to get facial reconstructive surgery and treatment for broken ribs and other conditions because of the explosions they experienced then.
1
9/11 unanswered questions on 20:49 - Mar 27 with 2093 views
You live in absolute cloud cuckoo land and are completely devoid common sense! Large HGV trucks carrying new paneling, building materials and concrete pouring transportation would have been required to help hide the hundreds upon hundreds of previously exposed locations.......And where would the utterly inexplicable relentless comings and goings of ready mix lorries park (they tend to go outside, hint!, hint!) without detection from New York general public?
Argus!
0
9/11 unanswered questions on 21:04 - Mar 27 with 2040 views
Voodoo Histories by David Aaronovitch (about as anti-establishment as it gets) exposes this conspiracy nonsense with proper research. He's also good on the psychology of the nutters who keep on believing this drivel even after it's been exposed for the fantasy it obviously is.
I'd recommend it to a few on here but I doubt if it would make any difference...
1
9/11 unanswered questions on 21:06 - Mar 27 with 2032 views
Depends if there's more than two frames with anything to see.
I'd imagine that the plane was moving at a fair lick. Say a generously slow 300mph (roughly half of the normal cruising speed of a 757). Were security cameras in 2001, even military ones, capable of catching more than a glimpse of something moving that fast through a limited field of vision?
Pain or damage don't end the world. Or despair, or f*cking beatings. The world ends when you're dead. Until then, you got more punishment in store. Stand it like a man... and give some back.
-1
9/11 unanswered questions on 21:19 - Mar 27 with 1967 views
Why do you suppose that they would have to hide anything from the general public? They explained that they were doing network upgrades. As I mentioned, it was published in national media that the security cameras were turned off for two weeks and bomb-sniffing dogs were removed. You are the one who is lacking common sense. Crashes from planes do not cause multiple explosions and people to get burnt and injured badly in the sub-basements. Carbon fires do not cause collapses of buildings that tall in 11 seconds on their own footprint while not significantly damaging surrounding buildings. Otherwise, they could save millions of dollars and demolish other buildings of that kind in like manner. Furthermore, if explosives were not used, why is it that thousands of bone fragments were found on the rooftops of surrounding buildings which were no longer than a centimeter in length? How can a fire pulverize concrete? Just because you've worked in construction doesn't mean that you can pretend that you've answered these questions.
0
9/11 unanswered questions on 21:25 - Mar 27 with 1950 views
I think it's a reasonable assumption that more than one camera was in operation in the vicinity of a building such as the Pentagon, even in 2001, that would have captured far more than has been released.
0
9/11 unanswered questions on 21:28 - Mar 27 with 1933 views
Yes, and the photos have the wrong date. Rather surreal I'd say. Of course, if anyone points that out, they could just pretend that they've made a mistake.
0
9/11 unanswered questions on 21:29 - Mar 27 with 1930 views
I don't doubt that there was more than one camera. I do doubt that something shifting at 300mph+, even something as large as a 757, would show up in a field of vision of about 40/50 yards for more than a millisecond.
Pain or damage don't end the world. Or despair, or f*cking beatings. The world ends when you're dead. Until then, you got more punishment in store. Stand it like a man... and give some back.
0
9/11 unanswered questions on 21:31 - Mar 27 with 1921 views
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
