| Alan Curtis: New arrivails might mean Gomis on 18:28 - Jan 11 with 6488 views | Swansea93 |
Good, his head is in Dubai anyway.
We need a new striker ASAP though, would of been nice to get one in time for Sunderland. | |
|  |
| Alan Curtis: New arrivails might mean Gomis on 18:32 - Jan 11 with 6425 views | VetchitBack |
 | |
| The orthodox are always orthodox, regardless of the orthodoxy.
|
| |
| Alan Curtis: New arrivails might mean Gomis on 18:44 - Jan 11 with 6296 views | legoman |
...have... | |
| "M'sieur, you said your dog did not bite!"
"That's not my dog" |
| |
| Alan Curtis: New arrivails might mean Gomis on 18:56 - Jan 11 with 6194 views | marchamjack |
innit | |
| Oh,..Dave, what's occuring? |
| |
| Alan Curtis: New arrivails might mean Gomis on 18:59 - Jan 11 with 6162 views | shandyjack |
i don't quite understand the line, that 'there is a lot of work going on behind the scenes'. What are they doing, surely targets would have already been identified and it's a case of bidding for them and narrowing down the specific targets.
I have tbh and say that i doubt we'll get anyone of note in, it''s not sounding promising at all. | |
| |
| Alan Curtis: New arrivails might mean Gomis on 19:40 - Jan 11 with 5944 views | AngelRangelQS |
No it's not sounding very positive in terms of bringing anyone in.
It's all quite contradictory too | | | |
| Alan Curtis: New arrivails might mean Gomis on 19:44 - Jan 11 with 5911 views | caerleon_jack |
Didn't you just answer your own question? | |
| Insert something witty here |
| |
| Alan Curtis: New arrivails might mean Gomis on 19:47 - Jan 11 with 5898 views | A_Fans_Dad |
Is AC preparing the way by putting pressure on Gomis? | | | |
| Alan Curtis: New arrivails might mean Gomis on 19:48 - Jan 11 with 5877 views | Dyfnant |
Sounding like no one out = no one in | |
| |
| Alan Curtis: New arrivails might mean Gomis on 19:52 - Jan 11 with 5848 views | shandyjack |
No | |
| |
| Alan Curtis: New arrivails might mean Gomis on 19:55 - Jan 11 with 5818 views | caerleon_jack |
You said you don't understand what work is going on behind the scenes and then explained exactly what sort of work is going on behind the scenes? | |
| Insert something witty here |
| |
| Alan Curtis: New arrivails might mean Gomis on 20:02 - Jan 11 with 5732 views | AngelRangelQS |
Its quite clear that most of this window's activity in is dependent on what we can con other clubs out of for Shelvey and Gomis.
On that basis, we probably can't go out and do much business until we known what kind of cash we have coming in. Hopefully if a fee is agreed for JJS we can go out and make a bid or two now. | | | |
| Alan Curtis: New arrivails might mean Gomis on 20:05 - Jan 11 with 5694 views | shandyjack |
No,I meant that work should have already been done and now is just a case of finalising deals. Seems we haven't got a clue who we want, as a fan it doesn't seem like much is being done behind the scenes | |
| |
| Alan Curtis: New arrivails might mean Gomis on 20:07 - Jan 11 with 5655 views | AngelRangelQS |
We probably don't know who we can afford as opposed to who we want | | | |
| Alan Curtis: New arrivails might mean Gomis on 20:07 - Jan 11 with 5653 views | VetchitBack |
We are the "Swans" remember? | |
| The orthodox are always orthodox, regardless of the orthodoxy.
|
| |
| Alan Curtis: New arrivails might mean Gomis on 20:09 - Jan 11 with 5625 views | caerleon_jack |
So what would you like to hear?
Taking into account that we are never going to state in the press who we are after, what do you honestly think Curtis is going to say? | |
| Insert something witty here |
| |
| Alan Curtis: New arrivails might mean Gomis on 20:21 - Jan 11 with 5503 views | dobjack2 |
people didn't think that our transfer business would be dependant on who leaves, that we would have scouted front line strikers and would have had a deal or deals ready to go.
Anyone leaving would need to be replaced not, as it seems be needed to fund our activity. | | | |
| Alan Curtis: New arrivails might mean Gomis on 20:37 - Jan 11 with 5374 views | shandyjack |
Id expect a bit of movement so far.bids in for players and not leaving it till last minute | |
| |
| Alan Curtis: New arrivails might mean Gomis on 20:45 - Jan 11 with 5310 views | AngelRangelQS |
Don't disagree mate but we are probably restricted by who we can ship out | | | |
| Alan Curtis: New arrivails might mean Gomis on 20:59 - Jan 11 with 5253 views | LeonisGod |
It's almost like we need a manager with a clear idea of the direction he wants to go and good connections (like Brenda bringing in Borini & Sinclair; Laudrup bringing in Michu and JDG).
I won't mention Souza and Lopez  | | | |
| Alan Curtis: New arrivails might mean Gomis on 21:02 - Jan 11 with 5235 views | epaul |
Seen touted Gomis and Defoe straight swap | |
| The hair and the beard have gone I am now conforming to society, tis a sad day
The b*stards are coming back though |
| |
| Alan Curtis: New arrivails might mean Gomis on 21:51 - Jan 11 with 5078 views | dobjack2 |
So we would swap Gomis for Defoe and pay Gomis £4 million | | | |
| Alan Curtis: New arrivails might mean Gomis on 21:56 - Jan 11 with 5042 views | NeiltheTaylor |
Good that there's plenty going on behind the scenes as we're dying on stage... | |
| Joe_bradshaw -I thought the cryochamber was the new name for Cardiff's stadium.
|
| |
| Alan Curtis: New arrivails might mean Gomis on 22:08 - Jan 11 with 4995 views | longlostjack |
If the transfer dealings go to the wire so what? The January window is notoriously difficult and getting our transfer business done early in the summer didn't particularly help did it? | |
| |
| Alan Curtis: New arrivails might mean Gomis on 22:54 - Jan 11 with 4862 views | Dyfnant |
Maybe because we need a striker now | |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
