| Onahua.. No thanks. 00:11 - May 3 with 12216 views | WilloW4 |
For months I've been saying he's crap. Just get rid. Some posters on here seem to like him. Explain please. | | | |  |
| Onahua.. No thanks. on 11:32 - May 3 with 2504 views | Discodroids |
i dunno mate, id just woken up and went off on one , its just not very nice to log on to this board on what now seems a daily basis to have some herbert having a snide dig like some komodo dragon flicking out his forked tongue .
its a drip drip effect on here that brings me right down..the lot of em can all gather round and devour me when im laid to rest in the sprinbok public house watering hole.
jesus its bad enough this season without being pulled up on spelling and punctuation. I remember a bloke who used to work in lloyds , an fcca accountant on our syndicate, who used to pull up some of the junior staff publicly.
he used to mime to 'layla' by derek and the dominoes holding a broom , throwing his head back clapton esq style at the christmas parties..
i even saw him apologise to a dormant chair once when he bumped into it..see what i mean willow!.
 | |
| The Duke Of New York. A-Number One.
|
| |
| Onahua.. No thanks. on 11:33 - May 3 with 2515 views | eastside_r |
Literally WTF!?
I presume you replied to the wrong post / thread. | | | |
| Onahua.. No thanks. on 11:45 - May 3 with 2474 views | Discodroids |
bollocks. | |
| The Duke Of New York. A-Number One.
|
| |
| Onahua.. No thanks. on 11:53 - May 3 with 2477 views | Marc |
Because he's built like a brick shithouse doesnt make him a leader
Someone like Scott Dann or our very own Richard Dunne as a leader type next to Onuoha is what i'm guessing he meant
More than good enough for the new season ahead | | | |
| Onahua.. No thanks. on 13:13 - May 3 with 2420 views | THEBUSH |
What Centre Backs does the OP think, are good enough for us  | | | |
| Onahua.. No thanks. on 13:48 - May 3 with 2396 views | BklynRanger |
It was 2 or 3 years ago that he lost his mum, Cali. | | | |
| Onahua.. No thanks. on 13:56 - May 3 with 2390 views | AgedR |
He was signed by Hughes and was much vaunted at the time, so I suspect he may well be on a few quid.
I rather like him. He has made significantly less errors than Caulker this season and has the pace that we suffer from the lack of when Dunne or Hill play there.
His touch isnt great and I think that Isla must be scratching his head over the fact that Ned is playing in front of him.
But, he's the best of the centre half options we have I think. However, assuming SOG's point is correct (and on this occasion I think it might be), we should listen to offers.
The pay structure at the club has to be reformed. | |
| |
| Onahua.. No thanks. on 14:32 - May 3 with 2331 views | HollowayRanger |
simpson elmer dunne yun
that would do for me
with hill as sub defender | |
| |
| Onahua.. No thanks. on 14:34 - May 3 with 2338 views | kensalriser |
Simpson plays for Leicester. Why the fck would he come back to QPR? | |
| |
| Onahua.. No thanks. on 14:37 - May 3 with 2328 views | Bedford_R |
Whinge, whinge, whinge. Blah, blah, blah. Scapegoat. Carry on.... | |
| |
| Onahua.. No thanks. on 14:48 - May 3 with 2305 views | BazzaInTheLoft |
......knee jerk knee jerk, rant rant rant. speculation speculation speculation........ | | | |
| Onahua.. No thanks. on 14:54 - May 3 with 2287 views | Gloucs_R |
Personally I am just hoping for a settled back 4 next year.
RB / Ehmer or Onouha / Caulker / Yun
Back up - Robinson, Harriman, Dunne, plus the lads from the U21.
Sorry but resigning Hill would be a mistake in my opinion, unless it was player coach. | |
| |
| Onahua.. No thanks. on 14:54 - May 3 with 2279 views | HollowayRanger |
because he isn't playing for Leicester cant get in the team
and because the idiot who sold him has left the building | |
| |
| Onahua.. No thanks. on 15:23 - May 3 with 2272 views | Gloucs_R |
I would have Simpson back | |
| |
| Onahua.. No thanks. on 15:36 - May 3 with 2251 views | QPR_John |
"I think one of the teams coming up may take him but I like Ned. He is a well educated lad, works hard, but as everyone says, possibly more suited to the Championship, purely because his ball play is so limited."
Why would a promoted team take him if he is more suited to the Championship | | | |
| Onahua.. No thanks. on 15:48 - May 3 with 2119 views | Marc |
Robinson is out for a year after picking up an injury around late feb/early march | | | |
| Onahua.. No thanks. on 15:53 - May 3 with 2108 views | SpiritofGregory |
We need to stop looking to the past, we need a fresh start. No one in their right mind would leave Leicester to come to QPR even if they are not good enough to get into the first team. | | | |
| Onahua.. No thanks. on 16:05 - May 3 with 2088 views | Marc |
I'd take Matt Connolly and Jamie Mackie back
Both realistic and available | | | |
| Onahua.. No thanks. on 16:23 - May 3 with 2074 views | SpiritofGregory |
Connolly has just been promoted with Watford.
Jaime Mackie isn't good enough for the Premier League and hasn't set the world alight at Reading.
How can you expect the club to have a decent scouting network when the fans want to sign players from the past. We need a fresh start, starting with the chairman. | | | |
| Onahua.. No thanks. on 16:42 - May 3 with 2042 views | BazzaInTheLoft |
Yeah, we need fresh blood to scapegoat and rant about. No good just slagging the same old people. | | | |
| Onahua.. No thanks. on 21:51 - May 3 with 1944 views | YorkRanger |
Ned will be fine in the Championship. Ehmer will be good to get involved and Sendles White. I'd keep Dunne and Hill. If we can get our money back on Caulker then get rid.
As for some of the other comments. I for one would carry Mackie on my back from Reading to Shepherds Bush.
Some people need to get real and re-,set their sights. We will be in the Championship..... | | | |
| Onahua.. No thanks. on 22:52 - May 3 with 1892 views | danehoop |
Of course SOG, I forgot that you have access to every players contract and what they are being paid.
Oh sorry, you don't and like so much of what you say was just spurious nonsense. How is Stephen Pressley by the way? Surely a shoe in for the new season? | |
| Never knowingly understood |
| |
| Onahua.. No thanks. on 23:11 - May 3 with 1876 views | OakR |
with good run at CB I think he is more than decent - he has something we lack aka pace.
He is not a right back however and I think this taints people's view of him. Settle him in at CB and keep him there and we will reap the rewards.
That said I doubt he will stay.
I would keep Hill on as well - will still do a job for us at CB when called upon. I'd go, subject to if they would accept the salary, Ehmer, Dunner, Hill, Ned | |
| |
| Onahua.. No thanks. on 07:16 - May 4 with 1818 views | fakekerby |
I'd sell him for any offers around 3-4 million.
He's nothing special and easily replaceable.
He's certainly not a premier league player - he'll be good in the championship which I why I wouldn't sell him cheaply but he's not vital for us next season one way or the other. | | | |
| Onahua.. No thanks. on 08:54 - May 4 with 1763 views | danehoop |
Start off with what is better that is available?
Then remove from that list anyone with a significant transfer fee.
Then remove from that list those who wouldn't be interested in joining us.
Suddenly there are far fewer options available to us which are either as good as, let alone better than what we currently have.
He is our player, he played reasonably well in the Premiership, is fit, quick motivated and effective, particularly with a verbal centre back next too him. | |
| Never knowingly understood |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
