| Three game ban for Austin on the cards 16:41 - Apr 7 with 12034 views | FrankRightguard |
If they have bothered to charge him they’ll certainly ban him. |  | | |  |
| Three game ban for Austin on the cards on 17:43 - Apr 7 with 2478 views | daveB |
| Three game ban for Austin on the cards on 17:30 - Apr 7 by Northernr |
My understanding of the rule is if he's seen it and deemed it accidental then they can't act. You can only retrospectively punish something if the referee says he missed it entirely. |
Oh in that case he's lied and made out he didn't see it then as it was right in front of him |  | | |
| Three game ban for Austin on the cards on 17:48 - Apr 7 with 2450 views | PinnerPaul |
| Three game ban for Austin on the cards on 17:30 - Apr 7 by Northernr |
My understanding of the rule is if he's seen it and deemed it accidental then they can't act. You can only retrospectively punish something if the referee says he missed it entirely. |
Yep! |  | | |
| Three game ban for Austin on the cards on 17:51 - Apr 7 with 2437 views | PinnerPaul |
| Three game ban for Austin on the cards on 17:41 - Apr 7 by gazza1 |
So, if the ref saw it on the day and just gave CA a volley of words at the time = end of the matter but because nothing was mentioned someone has highlighted it.....who is that 'someone'?? |
Match observer.
As I've said before, EVERY decision/non decision is 'marked'. | | | |
| Three game ban for Austin on the cards on 17:51 - Apr 7 with 2432 views | BrianMcCarthy |
Can we fine him? Or do we have to pay his wages in full while he takes three games off? |  |
| |
| Three game ban for Austin on the cards on 17:53 - Apr 7 with 2422 views | Northernr |
I just don't get how he can keep making these basic, fundamental mistakes and still not only be on the Champ list, but seemingly considered one of the best ones on it.
* this is in no way detracting from the separate point that Austin's been a knob and deserves the ban. |  | | |
| Three game ban for Austin on the cards on 17:56 - Apr 7 with 2405 views | PinnerPaul |
| Three game ban for Austin on the cards on 17:51 - Apr 7 by BrianMcCarthy |
Can we fine him? Or do we have to pay his wages in full while he takes three games off? |
"Above my pay grade", but I think most clubs have a sliding scale of fines for misconduct.
Also, players usually paid extra for appearances/goals/wins, so he will 'just' receive his 'basic', if/while banned. Of course, all this complicated/muddled further by the fact he is WBA's player who are probably paying most/all/some????? of his wages anyway!
You know, I think MW is on to something with that opening line!  | | | |
| Three game ban for Austin on the cards on 17:56 - Apr 7 with 2403 views | ted_hendrix |
Pratt. |  |
| My Father had a profound influence on me, he was a lunatic. |
| |
| Three game ban for Austin on the cards on 18:05 - Apr 7 with 2364 views | Myke |
Think we are losing sight of the main issue here guys. If Charlie deliberately stamped on him - and it looks that way - then that is not just stupid but potentially dangerous and he deserved to be punished. Again it's the same old thing, blame the ref because Charlie is so popular. Ask yourself what would the reaction be if it was Kane that did the stamping . Disgrace! Should be banned for life never mind three games! blah blah blah | | | |
Login to get fewer ads
| Three game ban for Austin on the cards on 18:07 - Apr 7 with 2363 views | eastside_r |
Saw it at the time. It was mentioned briefly on the MT by me and one other?
CA was not looking at the Forest player but it was an unnatural movement. Nailed on for 3 games, I’m afraid, as I see it.i |  | | |
| Three game ban for Austin on the cards on 18:13 - Apr 7 with 2346 views | denhamhoop2 |
Obviously CA saw his opportunity at a bit of revenge and took it. The fact that Stroud saw it and had no match awareness of the niggle between the 2 players just shows how inept he is as an official and yet somehow he will be named to referee at least one of the playoff games this season. A 3 game ban is imminent and cannot be argued against it was a snidey dig at an opponent | | | |
| Three game ban for Austin on the cards on 18:18 - Apr 7 with 2329 views | Cliff |
I know football is a different working environment from what most of us experience, but ...
.. if you could slap someone who was annoying you at your workplace and your only punishment would be suspension for 3 weeks on full pay .....
.. I mean full pay, three weeks off, and you got to slap someone who annoyed you! |  | | |
| Three game ban for Austin on the cards on 18:28 - Apr 7 with 2290 views | Boston |
| Three game ban for Austin on the cards on 16:43 - Apr 7 by flynnbo |
For the "stamp"? |
Oh yeah, just how much is first class postage these days? | |
| |
| Three game ban for Austin on the cards on 18:40 - Apr 7 with 2250 views | Ashdown_Ranger |
1: Seems a stupid, sly kick.
2: Deliberate, but no more than a very minor, petulant kick - niggly rather than aggressive, handbags rather than dangerous.
3: Almost certainly going to get a ban - what a chance for Dykes and Bonne to stake their claims... |  | | |
| Three game ban for Austin on the cards on 18:43 - Apr 7 with 2236 views | davman |
| Three game ban for Austin on the cards on 18:28 - Apr 7 by Boston |
Oh yeah, just how much is first class postage these days? |
O well, he a'int gonna be here next season, so we need to see whether Bonne can follow Dykes down Improvement Avenue. |  |
| |
| Three game ban for Austin on the cards on 20:34 - Apr 7 with 2030 views | johncharles |
Yet another example of incompetent refereeing ends up with a player scapegoat. Nothing changes |  |
| Strong and stable my arse. |
| |
| Three game ban for Austin on the cards on 21:04 - Apr 7 with 1975 views | brendan |
| Three game ban for Austin on the cards on 20:34 - Apr 7 by johncharles |
Yet another example of incompetent refereeing ends up with a player scapegoat. Nothing changes |
Yes but if he was competent, sent him off for violent conduct, he’d get a 3 game ban, same result |  | | |
| Three game ban for Austin on the cards on 21:12 - Apr 7 with 1957 views | Malintabuk |
| Three game ban for Austin on the cards on 18:07 - Apr 7 by eastside_r |
Saw it at the time. It was mentioned briefly on the MT by me and one other?
CA was not looking at the Forest player but it was an unnatural movement. Nailed on for 3 games, I’m afraid, as I see it.i |
Yes I did mention it on the thread... and to be honest I wasn't sure if I saw it right at the time which was why I phrased it as a question
It looked bad on the day and seeing the replay it is bad....
Did they have words before? As I don't remember Charlie being clattered. It really looks like a frustration thing.
If it is that is not a good sign | | | |
| Three game ban for Austin on the cards on 21:17 - Apr 7 with 1938 views | BazzaInTheLoft |
| Three game ban for Austin on the cards on 17:27 - Apr 7 by PinnerPaul |
Yeeessssssss, bit of a fudge isn't it.
Observer will say/write - Did you see this incident?
If he says Yes - obvious question is why isn't it VC? If he says no, still marked down, as in theory, at least 1 of the 4 should see everything, but maybe not as much as saying I saw it but didn't think it was VC!
At this stage of Mr S's career, doubt it makes that much difference, but I guess self preservation steps in as it would for any of us! |
No ones likes Forest, but a Victoria Cross for stamping on them? Amazon gift card, maybe. |  | | |
| Three game ban for Austin on the cards on 07:04 - Apr 8 with 1667 views | distortR |
| Three game ban for Austin on the cards on 21:04 - Apr 7 by brendan |
Yes but if he was competent, sent him off for violent conduct, he’d get a 3 game ban, same result |
it would have been damning on the ref if CA had stayed on and scored the winner.
As it is, it didn't noticeably affect the result and we get to see where we are at now with the forwards who will be at the club next season. | | | |
| Three game ban for Austin on the cards on 08:32 - Apr 8 with 1582 views | stevec |
| Three game ban for Austin on the cards on 17:51 - Apr 7 by BrianMcCarthy |
Can we fine him? Or do we have to pay his wages in full while he takes three games off? |
Hopefully we’ll thank Charlie for saving our skin this season and say enjoy your three game break, you deserve it. |  | | |
| Three game ban for Austin on the cards on 08:33 - Apr 8 with 1587 views | TheChef |
| Three game ban for Austin on the cards on 17:14 - Apr 7 by BAWHoops |
Naughty naughty from Charlie there |
Mesmerising, in its own strange way. |  |
| |
| Three game ban for Austin on the cards on 08:47 - Apr 8 with 1578 views | Metallica_Hoop |
Oh well lets see if Mac grasps his Bonne chance. |  |
| Beer and Beef has made us what we are - The Prince Regent |
| |
| Three game ban for Austin on the cards on 09:41 - Apr 8 with 1491 views | johnhoop |
Anybody know how soon this is is likely to take effect? | | | |
| Three game ban for Austin on the cards on 10:11 - Apr 8 with 1433 views | daveB |
| Three game ban for Austin on the cards on 09:41 - Apr 8 by johnhoop |
Anybody know how soon this is is likely to take effect? |
will be straight away | | | |
| Three game ban for Austin on the cards on 14:10 - Apr 8 with 1229 views | CLAREMAN1995 |
| Three game ban for Austin on the cards on 17:34 - Apr 7 by Northernr |
He's done us up by lying. He's seen it and fcked it up. Instead of admitting that, in which case they wouldn't be able to do anything, he's now pretended he hasn't seen it at all, so they can retrospectively ban the player. |
You mean KS fcuked up and now QPR get screwed again anybody shocked not really . .Seriously that video seems pretty incriminating if legit and that was stupid,dirty and uncalled for so he should be banned IMO.
I guess I am shocked or maybe sad CA resorted to this I thought he was a saint but who knows the shite he puts up with week to week.I am sure he is targeted all the time with dirty late hits etc . |  | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
