Probably a stupid question... 18:49 - Dec 26 with 3124 views | loftboy | But Burnley’s strikers have scored something like 3 goals between them in the last 16 games, has Wells got a recall option in January because if they have can anyone suggest as to why they wouldn’t? | |
| | |
Probably a stupid question... on 19:22 - Dec 26 with 2966 views | mcqpr10 | I don’t think they can recall him if it’s a season long loan. If they can then he’s going back. Quality striker, even when he wasn’t scoring at the start you could see the difference in him compared to smith and Washington. | | | |
Probably a stupid question... on 19:32 - Dec 26 with 2891 views | Blue_Castello | I have been thinking exactly the same over the last couple of weeks he's the one loan player that we really would miss big time. Burnley have got Vokes, Wood, Barnes and Vydra as to whether Wells can bring anything extra to their attack is open to debate. Think most season long loans usually have a release clause inserted which can be activated in January just depends what Les and Lee negotiated. [Post edited 26 Dec 2018 19:34]
| | | |
Probably a stupid question... on 19:34 - Dec 26 with 2876 views | DejR_vu |
Probably a stupid question... on 19:22 - Dec 26 by mcqpr10 | I don’t think they can recall him if it’s a season long loan. If they can then he’s going back. Quality striker, even when he wasn’t scoring at the start you could see the difference in him compared to smith and Washington. |
Burnley are in a relegation scrap. Not sure they’ll want to play a striker they didn’t rate before. More likely to go out and buy someone i’d have thought. 🙠| |
| |
Probably a stupid question... on 19:39 - Dec 26 with 2847 views | rsonist | They've barely played Vydra as it is. | | | |
Probably a stupid question... on 19:54 - Dec 26 with 2745 views | kensalriser | Every silver lining has a cloud. | |
| |
Probably a stupid question... on 19:55 - Dec 26 with 2739 views | TacticalR | Hands off our Nahki. | |
| |
Probably a stupid question... on 20:06 - Dec 26 with 2674 views | Watford_Ranger | Plan A is to play two big lumps. Plan B is to throw on another big lump. Vydra is Plan C so don’t see Wells getting a look in. I really rate Dyche but don’t think he can afford to be as one-dimensional as he has been. | | | |
Probably a stupid question... on 20:16 - Dec 26 with 2609 views | smegma |
Probably a stupid question... on 20:06 - Dec 26 by Watford_Ranger | Plan A is to play two big lumps. Plan B is to throw on another big lump. Vydra is Plan C so don’t see Wells getting a look in. I really rate Dyche but don’t think he can afford to be as one-dimensional as he has been. |
Who cares how many dimensions Dyche has ?? | | | | Login to get fewer ads
Probably a stupid question... on 20:25 - Dec 26 with 2546 views | TacticalR | Aren't Burnley 'doing a Burnley' (taking the money and going down)? | |
| |
Probably a stupid question... on 20:39 - Dec 26 with 2455 views | bosh67 | In the words of the great Oscar Wilde.... Regarding Mr Wells and a return to the hills of Burnley.... Shut the f*ck up! | |
| |
Probably a stupid question... on 22:17 - Dec 26 with 2182 views | VancouverHoop | From a Burnley fan I know: "You’re safe. He never got a look in when he was here. Dyche does that a fair bit - buys a player and never plays him. Tendari Darikwa, Nathaniel Chalobah, Nakhi Wells and now Matej Vydra." Let's hope he's right. | | | |
Probably a stupid question... on 22:24 - Dec 26 with 2148 views | rsonist | He may be more appealing to them after they go down though. | | | |
Probably a stupid question... on 22:45 - Dec 26 with 2081 views | BrianMcCarthy |
Probably a stupid question... on 19:32 - Dec 26 by Blue_Castello | I have been thinking exactly the same over the last couple of weeks he's the one loan player that we really would miss big time. Burnley have got Vokes, Wood, Barnes and Vydra as to whether Wells can bring anything extra to their attack is open to debate. Think most season long loans usually have a release clause inserted which can be activated in January just depends what Les and Lee negotiated. [Post edited 26 Dec 2018 19:34]
|
As you say, no need to panic. The loan may have a clause or may not. I have no idea if it's usual or not. Does anyone know for sure if Wells' loan or Manning's loan have a recall clause or not? | |
| |
Probably a stupid question... on 23:35 - Dec 26 with 1969 views | qprjeff1882 | Les and Steve were saying at the fabs forum that the option to bring back Manning was being looked into so with Luongo going it looks likely however i haven't seen anything regarding Wells or whether he has a clause. I really hope not as this would really curtail our season. I very much doubt Wells would even want to go back there. | | | |
Probably a stupid question... on 01:31 - Dec 27 with 1816 views | timcocking | Hard to comprehend. If i was to try, i'd say it's the fact his selection process isn't always Premier league class. When he shot yesterday for the first goal being a prime example. A two on one and he's shot from 35 yards out, not the right option. So much swerve and dip, he's got us a goal out of it, so brilliant Nahki, but pretty sure that wouldn't have been what Zidane recommended doing in that situation. I think it's fair to say that there have also been a couple of times previously when he's elected to shoot when another player is better positioned. That isn't perfect, certainly not to a coach like Sean Dyche. But gawd knows, he's been excellent and Sam Vokes never has been. | | | |
Probably a stupid question... on 10:46 - Dec 27 with 1607 views | CorbyQPR | Assume they’ll lose Wood to the same tournament as Luongo? | | | |
Probably a stupid question... on 10:57 - Dec 27 with 1578 views | CamberleyR |
Probably a stupid question... on 10:46 - Dec 27 by CorbyQPR | Assume they’ll lose Wood to the same tournament as Luongo? |
No, this is just for teams in the Asian football confederation. NZ play in the Oceania confederation. | |
| |
Probably a stupid question... on 11:17 - Dec 27 with 1558 views | GloryHunter | I don't suppose they'd be interested in Sylla instead? | | | |
Probably a stupid question... on 11:23 - Dec 27 with 1537 views | QPR_John |
Probably a stupid question... on 22:24 - Dec 26 by rsonist | He may be more appealing to them after they go down though. |
I think that is the biggest worry | | | |
Probably a stupid question... on 11:48 - Dec 27 with 1482 views | Watford_Ranger |
Probably a stupid question... on 11:17 - Dec 27 by GloryHunter | I don't suppose they'd be interested in Sylla instead? |
Who? | | | |
Probably a stupid question... on 11:57 - Dec 27 with 1457 views | DavieQPR | If a fee as well as a percentage of wages was agreed then the loan agreement cannot be cancelled. If we have not paid a fee then a loan agreement can be cancelled if a prior arrangement had been made. This is unlikely as I think we would have sent Hemed back who would have been signed on a similar agreement. | | | |
Probably a stupid question... on 12:04 - Dec 27 with 1426 views | CamberleyR |
Probably a stupid question... on 11:57 - Dec 27 by DavieQPR | If a fee as well as a percentage of wages was agreed then the loan agreement cannot be cancelled. If we have not paid a fee then a loan agreement can be cancelled if a prior arrangement had been made. This is unlikely as I think we would have sent Hemed back who would have been signed on a similar agreement. |
I thought they said at the fans forum that no fees were paid, hence why they were relatively late coming to us in the window. | |
| |
Probably a stupid question... on 12:40 - Dec 27 with 1372 views | GloryHunter | It's not January yet. Maybe Hemed will be sent back? | | | |
Probably a stupid question... on 13:03 - Dec 27 with 1329 views | Silverfoxqpr |
Probably a stupid question... on 22:24 - Dec 26 by rsonist | He may be more appealing to them after they go down though. |
Nah, we'll have gone up in the opposite direction by then into the promised land. Wells will be our first signing on £350k a week. | | | |
| |