| Website Showing Team's Wages etc. 16:52 - Jan 24 with 4525 views | Cleedale |
Not sure whether this has been posted before or if it's trustworthy. Still, perhaps worth a gander. Seems like a lot of figures to put together if not.
https://salarysport.com/football/sky-bet-league-one/rochdale/
Btw., as you'll see, all teams posted and a few other sports; see what you all think? |  | | |  |
| Website Showing Team's Wages etc. on 17:02 - Jan 24 with 4492 views | judd |
Whereas I have no objection to seeing a total wage bill, I do think it is wrong to speculate on and publish an individuals' suspected earnings.
I do know that some of the information contained within this list is incorrect.
Not having a go, Cleedale, as it is already in the public domain. |  |
| |
| Website Showing Team's Wages etc. on 18:24 - Jan 24 with 4346 views | oddjob007 |
Surely the Matt Done number can’t be right!?!
The rest look about right to me. [Post edited 24 Jan 2021 18:24]
| | | |
| Website Showing Team's Wages etc. on 18:28 - Jan 24 with 4330 views | fitzochris |
| Website Showing Team's Wages etc. on 18:24 - Jan 24 by oddjob007 |
Surely the Matt Done number can’t be right!?!
The rest look about right to me. [Post edited 24 Jan 2021 18:24]
|
It’s got wages for loan players too - and Haydon Roberts’ are not right, unless that’s just our contribution to them.
I agree with Judd though - it seems a bit crass to show individual wages, especially when there is so much disparity between them. |  |
| |
| Website Showing Team's Wages etc. on 19:53 - Jan 24 with 4187 views | Dalenet |
If these are true, and I am not 100% convinced, it would suggest that Crewe and Accy are paying a lot less than we do. Hull seems to be low, whereas Sunderland, Ipswich and Charlton will have a lot of challenge once the true salary caps wash through. | | | |
| Website Showing Team's Wages etc. on 20:17 - Jan 24 with 4123 views | D_Alien |
| Website Showing Team's Wages etc. on 19:53 - Jan 24 by Dalenet |
If these are true, and I am not 100% convinced, it would suggest that Crewe and Accy are paying a lot less than we do. Hull seems to be low, whereas Sunderland, Ipswich and Charlton will have a lot of challenge once the true salary caps wash through. |
What those figures don't take into account (and i agree about dubious accuracy) is when were the contracts signed which led to those wages. Players on a contract signed a couple of years ago are like those from a different era now, and it could be that clubs like Crewe & Accy have more-recently signed contracts which is reflected in the lower values. Just a thought, because at the end of the day we're competing in pretty much the same player pool as those two clubs |  |
| |
| Website Showing Team's Wages etc. on 20:18 - Jan 24 with 4113 views | Thacks_Rabbits |
| Website Showing Team's Wages etc. on 18:28 - Jan 24 by fitzochris |
It’s got wages for loan players too - and Haydon Roberts’ are not right, unless that’s just our contribution to them.
I agree with Judd though - it seems a bit crass to show individual wages, especially when there is so much disparity between them. |
I cannot for 1 minute think we are paying Bazuna anything like 5200 quid a week, when essentially it’s a mutually beneficial thing for us and city. Maybe he is on that at city and we contribute c amount.
Tbh those figures look like a load of crap to me, Newby won’t be on the same as Hump and I think it’s well reported/rumoured what Done is on roughly. Look at Fleetwoods figures as they make interesting (made up) reading |  |
| |
| Website Showing Team's Wages etc. on 20:47 - Jan 24 with 4034 views | judd |
It's certainly food for thought that we would allegedly pay a combined £9,400 per week for 2 novices yet would show the door to our 2 leading scorers from last season who appear to be earning a combined couple of grand less at their new clubs, when the elephant in the room causing all the financial woes at football league clubs is player wages. | |
| |
| Website Showing Team's Wages etc. on 21:18 - Jan 24 with 3973 views | D_Alien |
| Website Showing Team's Wages etc. on 20:47 - Jan 24 by judd |
It's certainly food for thought that we would allegedly pay a combined £9,400 per week for 2 novices yet would show the door to our 2 leading scorers from last season who appear to be earning a combined couple of grand less at their new clubs, when the elephant in the room causing all the financial woes at football league clubs is player wages. |
Food for thought, certainly; and for hors d'oeuvres, how do those lads who're tasked with helping their learning curve (a topical issue) feel about it?
Defensive cohesion is a precious thing; are we achieving it?
And this is irrespective of the percentage contribution to their wages being paid by Dale | |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| Website Showing Team's Wages etc. on 21:23 - Jan 24 with 3954 views | johnn |
Not sure these are correct,only know a couple of wages and these not similar to those shown here! |  | | |
| Website Showing Team's Wages etc. on 21:40 - Jan 24 with 3900 views | fitzochris |
| Website Showing Team's Wages etc. on 20:18 - Jan 24 by Thacks_Rabbits |
I cannot for 1 minute think we are paying Bazuna anything like 5200 quid a week, when essentially it’s a mutually beneficial thing for us and city. Maybe he is on that at city and we contribute c amount.
Tbh those figures look like a load of crap to me, Newby won’t be on the same as Hump and I think it’s well reported/rumoured what Done is on roughly. Look at Fleetwoods figures as they make interesting (made up) reading |
They look like a load of crap to me, too. Quite a few red flags in there. | |
| |
| Website Showing Team's Wages etc. on 21:55 - Jan 24 with 3873 views | Boss_Hog |
It must represent what they feel are their weekly wages as opposed to our contribution/loan fee.
According to that site, Blackpool had Liverpool loanee Ben Woodburn on 13k a week. | | | |
| Website Showing Team's Wages etc. on 22:05 - Jan 24 with 3848 views | judd |
| Website Showing Team's Wages etc. on 21:55 - Jan 24 by Boss_Hog |
It must represent what they feel are their weekly wages as opposed to our contribution/loan fee.
According to that site, Blackpool had Liverpool loanee Ben Woodburn on 13k a week. |
But then again it totals the expected annual spend on wages.
Does not take into account bonuses, employer NICs etc | |
| |
| Website Showing Team's Wages etc. on 06:46 - Jan 25 with 3623 views | nordenblue |
| Website Showing Team's Wages etc. on 22:05 - Jan 24 by judd |
But then again it totals the expected annual spend on wages.
Does not take into account bonuses, employer NICs etc |
It could be miles out anyway with the additional appearance bonus, goals bonus etc for many players | | | |
| Website Showing Team's Wages etc. on 08:20 - Jan 25 with 3564 views | Newbury_Dale |
Danny Mayer on 6500 a week at Plymouth according to the site. Surely not. | | | |
| Website Showing Team's Wages etc. on 08:22 - Jan 25 with 3557 views | fitzochris |
| Website Showing Team's Wages etc. on 08:20 - Jan 25 by Newbury_Dale |
Danny Mayer on 6500 a week at Plymouth according to the site. Surely not. |
I sent this link to an agent whose players are at some of the clubs featured. He said it’s bollocks, so that’s good enough for me. | |
| |
| Website Showing Team's Wages etc. on 08:46 - Jan 25 with 3527 views | TVOS1907 |
| Website Showing Team's Wages etc. on 08:20 - Jan 25 by Newbury_Dale |
Danny Mayer on 6500 a week at Plymouth according to the site. Surely not. |
He probably was on that at bury!! |  |
| When I was your age, I used to enjoy the odd game of tennis. Or was it golf? |
| |
| Website Showing Team's Wages etc. on 09:15 - Jan 25 with 3491 views | nordenblue |
| Website Showing Team's Wages etc. on 08:20 - Jan 25 by Newbury_Dale |
Danny Mayer on 6500 a week at Plymouth according to the site. Surely not. |
Don't be surprised, there was someone at Wigan over £10k a week to play in league 1 | | | |
| Website Showing Team's Wages etc. on 09:23 - Jan 25 with 3483 views | ChaffRAFC |
Football Manager and the stats for each team, including players wages and contracts are estimated as much as possible by their researchers. For example, I do the Rochdale stats and club information and some of those figures look very similar to the ones I estimated, not quite exactly I don't think but close to so it wouldn't surprise me if someone's collated the information from the game and created their own database based on that.
With regards the loan ones, those are either complete bullshit or just the wages they're on at their parent clubs with us paying maybe a 50% contribution tops. |  |
| If I hadn't seen such riches, I could live with being poor |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
