By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions. We in turn value your personal details in accordance with our Privacy Policy.
Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
Audited Accounts - Whose interpretation do you believe? on 16:44 - Mar 19 by londonlisa2001
Lol.
I asked because one of my first boyfriends was from Aarhus. Mads his name was.
It occurred to me that he may have been so smitten that years later he decided to support the hometown team of his young sweetheart and became Shaky :-)
Not really - the last bit I mean. That would be terrifying...
Audited Accounts - Whose interpretation do you believe? on 10:36 - Mar 19 by londonlisa2001
It doesn't matter whether it's settled in cash or not.
But those are significantly overstated. I assume that's transfer market which is what I expected you'd use.
BTW, it just occured to me if you are comparing the numbers I gave you to some sort of investment aggregate total, the Sanches fee would not appear since it is <1year and so not LT.
He's just go into the P&L as an expense but as a one-off it is best to exlude this so as not to distort the cost base. The cash-flow effect would be right, however.
And have seen comments that the £7 loan fee is way too high, but it certainly doesn't seem out of whack relative to what Bayern paid.
Audited Accounts - Whose interpretation do you believe? on 20:58 - Mar 20 by Shaky
BTW, it just occured to me if you are comparing the numbers I gave you to some sort of investment aggregate total, the Sanches fee would not appear since it is <1year and so not LT.
He's just go into the P&L as an expense but as a one-off it is best to exlude this so as not to distort the cost base. The cash-flow effect would be right, however.
And have seen comments that the £7 loan fee is way too high, but it certainly doesn't seem out of whack relative to what Bayern paid.
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
