Forum | Bit confused by RM's excuse for not introducing Lallana by Block8 |

Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread

Bit confused by RM's excuse for not introducing Lallana 14:59 - Oct 23 with 1077 views

"Asked why Lallana did not come on, Martin told the Daily Echo: "We were down to ten men and we were not going to have a lot of the ball.
"That's not Adam's strength. Adam's strength is to really dominate the ball. If we still had 11 men he would have come on today 100% and helped us create or control the game but he didn't."
But we had 11 men when you introduced Smallbone?

Bit confused by RM's excuse for not introducing Lallana on 15:59 - Oct 23 with 986 views

saint901

Think I've never seen Adam "dominate the ball".

Absolute tosh.

Bit confused by RM's excuse for not introducing Lallana on 16:35 - Oct 23 with 951 views

kingslandstand1

Will be interesting to see if he brings him on on Saturday then as I'd like to think we'll be able to keep 11 players on the field. Or because it's City will he be able to use the "we're not likely to have much of the ball" excuse
Fk me, he has more experience than anyone else on that pitch (in red and white or pink or whatever fkn kit they wear) that he should start against a team like City and at least give him a chance to dominate the ball. Although will he admit that we'll get stuffed and it doesn't really matter cos he won't get sacked
Downward spiral comes to mind right now

Bit confused by RM's excuse for not introducing Lallana on 12:10 - Oct 24 with 689 views

arfurdent

why would a turkey support Santa?

And the White Knight is talking backwards And the Red Queen's off with her head

Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread