Genuine question - from a Trust Member 19:19 - Nov 5 with 53459 views | marchamjack | Were The Trust any part of the discussion process to keep Clement? Thanks in advance. | |
| Oh,..Dave, what's occuring? |
| | |
Genuine question - from a Trust Member on 13:28 - Nov 11 with 2086 views | DafyddHuw |
Genuine question - from a Trust Member on 09:10 - Nov 11 by monmouth | Yes. Which probably rules him and 99.5% of the whole fan base out. I wonder if the ‘supporters’ Trust board might ask themselves why that is? All season ticket holders should be automatic members of the supporters trust. As soon as dividends rolled into town that tenner and a voluntary membership was pointless. A true supporters trust backed by 16000 co-opted members could be enormously powerful. Instead it is nothing. I’m really pissed off about this Dar, aren’t you? [Post edited 11 Nov 2017 9:10]
|
"All season ticket holders should be automatic members of the supporters trust." Are you kidding me? I've been an ST holder for longer than I can remember. I was a Trust member until this summer when I refused to rejoin after the pathetic vote. Are you saying that because I'm an ST holder I should automatically become a member of an organisation that I'd be embarrassed to be associated with in any way? Everyone should have a choice of whether they want to be a member of a dogshit organisation or not. I'd rather give up my ST if it means that I's automatically become a member of that shower of shite. | | | |
Genuine question - from a Trust Member on 13:56 - Nov 11 with 2044 views | Neath_Jack |
Genuine question - from a Trust Member on 13:28 - Nov 11 by DafyddHuw | "All season ticket holders should be automatic members of the supporters trust." Are you kidding me? I've been an ST holder for longer than I can remember. I was a Trust member until this summer when I refused to rejoin after the pathetic vote. Are you saying that because I'm an ST holder I should automatically become a member of an organisation that I'd be embarrassed to be associated with in any way? Everyone should have a choice of whether they want to be a member of a dogshit organisation or not. I'd rather give up my ST if it means that I's automatically become a member of that shower of shite. |
Your posts on this thread....absolutely disgusting. If that's where your head's at, you must have difficulty making decisions about whose got your back and whose dogshit. Just for one day, try not being an arse. | |
| |
Genuine question - from a Trust Member on 14:06 - Nov 11 with 2030 views | biggar | Literally gobsmacked by this update. Absolutely ridiculous. Shaking my head!! | | | |
Genuine question - from a Trust Member on 14:58 - Nov 11 with 1970 views | DafyddHuw |
Genuine question - from a Trust Member on 13:56 - Nov 11 by Neath_Jack | Your posts on this thread....absolutely disgusting. If that's where your head's at, you must have difficulty making decisions about whose got your back and whose dogshit. Just for one day, try not being an arse. |
I know it's difficult for you to be original and you have to steal other people's posts. But try, just once, to think for yourself. | | | |
Genuine question - from a Trust Member on 15:09 - Nov 11 with 1945 views | max936 |
Genuine question - from a Trust Member on 09:30 - Nov 11 by SoberBaker | "but Uxbridge posting on here is atrocious" His posting style? or the fact the poor b@stard is the only one man enough to come on here to communicate for the rest of the $hithouses? [Post edited 11 Nov 2017 9:32]
|
Great post Bake’s | |
| |
Genuine question - from a Trust Member on 16:38 - Nov 11 with 1867 views | QJumpingJack | If Jason and Steve are reading the last four pages of this thread, they will be laughing (at us the fans). | | | |
Genuine question - from a Trust Member on 16:44 - Nov 11 with 1860 views | monmouth |
Genuine question - from a Trust Member on 16:38 - Nov 11 by QJumpingJack | If Jason and Steve are reading the last four pages of this thread, they will be laughing (at us the fans). |
They'll already be laughing at the Trust Board 'statement'. It's something they could have written themselves. Hmmmm. | |
| |
Genuine question - from a Trust Member on 16:46 - Nov 11 with 1855 views | QJumpingJack | What do you mean? | | | | Login to get fewer ads
Genuine question - from a Trust Member on 17:04 - Nov 11 with 1825 views | exiledclaseboy | I didn’t realise there’d been a statement. Then I read the statement. They may well have not bothered. It doesn’t say anything. | |
| |
Genuine question - from a Trust Member on 17:04 - Nov 11 with 1824 views | monmouth | I mean that, taking a kind view, it was written to appease the yanks and Jenkins. Taking a cynical or paranoid view, it was approved or written jointly with the Yanks and Jenkins. | |
| |
Genuine question - from a Trust Member on 17:07 - Nov 11 with 1814 views | majorraglan |
Genuine question - from a Trust Member on 16:38 - Nov 11 by QJumpingJack | If Jason and Steve are reading the last four pages of this thread, they will be laughing (at us the fans). |
I reckon it’s safe to say that someone from the club is monitoring this and the other message boards. | | | |
Genuine question - from a Trust Member on 17:19 - Nov 11 with 1787 views | londonlisa2001 |
Genuine question - from a Trust Member on 17:04 - Nov 11 by exiledclaseboy | I didn’t realise there’d been a statement. Then I read the statement. They may well have not bothered. It doesn’t say anything. |
Funnily enough, I think that not bothering would have been a lot better. That would at least have been passive doing nothing - this is active doing nothing. | | | |
Genuine question - from a Trust Member on 17:21 - Nov 11 with 1780 views | QJumpingJack |
Genuine question - from a Trust Member on 17:19 - Nov 11 by londonlisa2001 | Funnily enough, I think that not bothering would have been a lot better. That would at least have been passive doing nothing - this is active doing nothing. |
they promised a statement on Monday so had to produce something. | | | |
Genuine question - from a Trust Member on 17:32 - Nov 11 with 1760 views | exiledclaseboy |
Genuine question - from a Trust Member on 17:21 - Nov 11 by QJumpingJack | they promised a statement on Monday so had to produce something. |
But in producing something they actually said nothing. [Post edited 11 Nov 2017 17:33]
| |
| |
Genuine question - from a Trust Member on 18:00 - Nov 11 with 1689 views | londonlisa2001 |
Genuine question - from a Trust Member on 17:32 - Nov 11 by exiledclaseboy | But in producing something they actually said nothing. [Post edited 11 Nov 2017 17:33]
|
I guess for me it was the tone. In particular this bit: "The Supporters Trust firmly believes that the fans have every right to make their views known with regards to all aspects of the running of the football club, and members of the Supporters Trust board engaged in conversation with those taking part in the recent protest before the Brighton game to discuss their grievances." That sounds like something from the Americans not the Trust. I mean, of course the fans have the right to make our views known - what on earth is this supposed to mean. Why on earth would anyone think we don't? "There, there, we know you're unhappy and we'll talk to you". 'Engaged in conversation' - what doesn't that mean? They shouldn't need to engage in conversation to know what the grievances are. It's obvious to all of us that have to sit through that crap for 90 minutes every week what they are. And they're going to discuss how to solve things... Here's a suggestion. Get rid of Jenkins. Get a manager that concentrates on making other teams worry about us rather than sets up to counter what they may do when we're playing Brighton. Structure a team and squad, don't buy players that don't fit us, however much we think they're a good buy. Stop thinking we're football geniuses because SAF once said he's going to sack his scouting team for not signing Michu. | | | |
Genuine question - from a Trust Member on 18:33 - Nov 11 with 1635 views | monmouth | "The Supporters Trust firmly believes that the fans have every right to make their views known with regards to all aspects of the running of the football club, and members of the Supporters Trust board engaged in conversation with those taking part in the recent protest before the Brighton game to discuss their grievances." Once again it reads as if the Trust aren't the fans. Who the f*ck do they think they are? get them all out. Put Sooty and Sweep in their places. They would be heavyweights compared to the bunch of fannies we have there. I'm still f*cking livid. | |
| |
Genuine question - from a Trust Member on 19:43 - Nov 11 with 1567 views | Gowerjack | And where is the trusts mouthpiece on here? Nowhere to be seen. | |
| |
Genuine question - from a Trust Member on 19:52 - Nov 11 with 1548 views | 34dfgdf54 |
Genuine question - from a Trust Member on 18:33 - Nov 11 by monmouth | "The Supporters Trust firmly believes that the fans have every right to make their views known with regards to all aspects of the running of the football club, and members of the Supporters Trust board engaged in conversation with those taking part in the recent protest before the Brighton game to discuss their grievances." Once again it reads as if the Trust aren't the fans. Who the f*ck do they think they are? get them all out. Put Sooty and Sweep in their places. They would be heavyweights compared to the bunch of fannies we have there. I'm still f*cking livid. |
Beyond belief. | | | |
Genuine question - from a Trust Member on 20:29 - Nov 11 with 1499 views | monmouth |
Genuine question - from a Trust Member on 19:52 - Nov 11 by 34dfgdf54 | Beyond belief. |
Anyone on the Trust board who does have any backbone and is not just a lackey of the regime should resign now and make a resignation speech totally ridiculing , naming and damning the cocks that have decided on appeasement and forelock tugging. One of you...Ux?, Phil?, show some leadership here. Unless you do believe in this pathetic and supine approach, in which case I am baffled, because either you are being too clever, or you are not the men I thought you were. And I might not be the sharpest tool in the box, but I cannot see anything clever in this at all. | |
| |
Genuine question - from a Trust Member on 20:44 - Nov 11 with 1483 views | E20Jack | Reminds me of the triage system in the NHS. They can say they have communicated now even though they have said nothing. | |
| |
Genuine question - from a Trust Member on 20:50 - Nov 11 with 1470 views | QJumpingJack | We know Matt G, Phil and Ux post on this site. Why don't the other trust board members contribute? I would be amazed if others didn't read this site/were aware of current feeling. | | | |
Genuine question - from a Trust Member on 21:25 - Nov 11 with 1427 views | SwansNZ |
Genuine question - from a Trust Member on 23:08 - Nov 10 by monmouth | You useless bastards, get out of our club. Anyone who contributes a tenner to maintain that heap of shit is off their rocker. |
I'm amazed anyone did after the farcical vote this year. I'm certainly glad I didn't. | |
| |
Genuine question - from a Trust Member on 21:47 - Nov 11 with 1398 views | E20Jack | Some are oblivious to it all and back them regardless. The Trust know this also, hence why they made a recommendation that suited their own ends - knowing they would get hundreds of votes from people who simply did not know. | |
| |
Genuine question - from a Trust Member on 22:32 - Nov 11 with 1342 views | MoscowJack | It felt, to me, as if they wanted to say something important but either just didn't or couldn't! It was so lacking in anything that it seems as if the important or interesting parts had been edited out. I am also starting to think that the Trust is just so far out of touch with the feelings of the average fans nowadays. I don't know why it feels like this, but that's how it feels. Sometimes the perception is spot on, sometimes it's not, but I think having someone to focus on the PR and communications is a must now. | |
| |
| |