| £50m or Gylfi and Llorente? 23:07 - May 8 with 8967 views | Kinsey |
I know what I would have chosen then and what I’d still choose now. |  | | |  |
| £50m or Gylfi and Llorente? on 23:11 - May 8 with 4429 views | peenemunde |
They weren’t replaced , big, big, big, big mistake. |  | | |
| £50m or Gylfi and Llorente? on 23:13 - May 8 with 4399 views | Gowerjack |
Do keep up
They were holding us back mun
Do you know fack all about football...? |  |
| |
| £50m or Gylfi and Llorente? on 23:24 - May 8 with 4336 views | Kinsey |
| £50m or Gylfi and Llorente? on 23:11 - May 8 by peenemunde |
They weren’t replaced , big, big, big, big mistake. |
This | | | |
| £50m or Gylfi and Llorente? on 23:24 - May 8 with 4328 views | Kinsey |
| £50m or Gylfi and Llorente? on 23:13 - May 8 by Gowerjack |
Do keep up
They were holding us back mun
Do you know fack all about football...? |
Really??? | | | |
| £50m or Gylfi and Llorente? on 23:28 - May 8 with 4280 views | Gowerjack |
| £50m or Gylfi and Llorente? on 23:24 - May 8 by Kinsey |
Really??? |
Yes
Dont you remember?
We were too reliant on their goals created from set pieces.
Our resident football genius worked it all out so it must be fackin true... | |
| |
| £50m or Gylfi and Llorente? on 23:30 - May 8 with 4243 views | LeonWasGod |
| £50m or Gylfi and Llorente? on 23:28 - May 8 by Gowerjack |
Yes
Dont you remember?
We were too reliant on their goals created from set pieces.
Our resident football genius worked it all out so it must be fackin true... |
I've enjoyed how many goals we've scored by running in behind this season. Must be over 100 now, surely? |  | | |
| £50m or Gylfi and Llorente? on 23:30 - May 8 with 4239 views | Dan_Swan |
Awaiting the Res to respond with his "one trick pony" nonsense.
You are spot on with this Kinsey as are others in saying they weren't replaced! |  |
| Still following Dr's orders! |
| |
| £50m or Gylfi and Llorente? on 23:32 - May 8 with 4224 views | AnotherJohn |
| £50m or Gylfi and Llorente? on 23:28 - May 8 by Gowerjack |
Yes
Dont you remember?
We were too reliant on their goals created from set pieces.
Our resident football genius worked it all out so it must be fackin true... |
Yep, I remember. The person concerned called me and about ten others very rude things for saying that the sales might get us relegated. |  | | |
Login to get fewer ads
| £50m or Gylfi and Llorente? on 23:32 - May 8 with 4219 views | Bloodyhills |
| £50m or Gylfi and Llorente? on 23:24 - May 8 by Kinsey |
Really??? |
You don't recognise satire then? :D | |
| |
| £50m or Gylfi and Llorente? on 23:33 - May 8 with 4194 views | Gowerjack |
| £50m or Gylfi and Llorente? on 23:32 - May 8 by Bloodyhills |
You don't recognise satire then? :D |
Aye
It wasn't even that fackin subtle... | |
| |
| £50m or Gylfi and Llorente? on 23:35 - May 8 with 4156 views | KingBony |
| £50m or Gylfi and Llorente? on 23:30 - May 8 by Dan_Swan |
Awaiting the Res to respond with his "one trick pony" nonsense.
You are spot on with this Kinsey as are others in saying they weren't replaced! |
He’ll call you a thick fack and offer to fill you in I would have thought. |  |
| Daddy Daddy cool, Daddy Daddy cool |
| |
| £50m or Gylfi and Llorente? on 23:36 - May 8 with 4139 views | nierika |
Ever consider that they didnt want to play here anymore? | | | |
| £50m or Gylfi and Llorente? on 23:39 - May 8 with 4098 views | BillyChong |
Their stats in black and white for all to read showed their value to the team last season. Tom Carrol top of the assists chart this season with a mighty 4. J Ayew top scorer with 7. Llorente scored 15 last season and Gylfi assisted 13. | | | |
| £50m or Gylfi and Llorente? on 23:40 - May 8 with 4091 views | TNT |
Kinsey, you'd have to be one of Jenkins' / Morgan's sell outs, or a Yank, to choose the former. | |
| |
| £50m or Gylfi and Llorente? on 23:40 - May 8 with 4084 views | Smellyplumz |
| £50m or Gylfi and Llorente? on 23:39 - May 8 by BillyChong |
Their stats in black and white for all to read showed their value to the team last season. Tom Carrol top of the assists chart this season with a mighty 4. J Ayew top scorer with 7. Llorente scored 15 last season and Gylfi assisted 13. |
Res will fill you in for that bro |  |
|
""Although I cannot promise or predict the future, I can guarantee one thing - the current board of directors will always fight, as we have done over the last 12 years, to work together as one with the Supporters Trust to make 100% sure that Swansea City football club remains the number one priority in all our thoughts and in every decision we make." | | Poll: | Huw Jenkins |
| |
| £50m or Gylfi and Llorente? on 23:46 - May 8 with 4041 views | Gowerjack |
| £50m or Gylfi and Llorente? on 23:40 - May 8 by TNT |
Kinsey, you'd have to be one of Jenkins' / Morgan's sell outs, or a Yank, to choose the former. |
Or be Jenkins fackin lapdog... | |
| |
| £50m or Gylfi and Llorente? on 23:46 - May 8 with 4041 views | Brynmill_Jack |
| £50m or Gylfi and Llorente? on 23:40 - May 8 by Smellyplumz |
Res will fill you in for that bro |
I'm in awe of your quotation there SP. There lies the lie. |  |
| Each time I go to Bedd - au........................ |
| |
| £50m or Gylfi and Llorente? on 23:46 - May 8 with 4037 views | LeonWasGod |
| £50m or Gylfi and Llorente? on 23:36 - May 8 by nierika |
Ever consider that they didnt want to play here anymore? |
While you're absolutely right, you've missed the point of the post. The person they're having a pop at was slagging off our two most influential players last season long before they knew where their futures lay. He was undermining the team, the manager and the owners (at that point, but seems to switch allegiances fairly easily). And calling anyone a c*nt who dared to beg to differ.
It's petty, internet point scoring. But fully justified, and a little bit of humour in an otherwise miserable season.
I'm sure if the Res is man enough to dish it out, he's man enough to take it and admit his mistakes. | | | |
| £50m or Gylfi and Llorente? on 23:49 - May 8 with 4000 views | E20Jack |
£50m no brainer.
I would have spent it better, but that is not the question is it. |  |
| |
| £50m or Gylfi and Llorente? on 23:49 - May 8 with 3998 views | giantstoneater |
| £50m or Gylfi and Llorente? on 23:13 - May 8 by Gowerjack |
Do keep up
They were holding us back mun
Do you know fack all about football...? |
Yes keep up we were supposed to back to playing free flowing football best thing we did was to sell those long ball merchants!! |  | | |
| £50m or Gylfi and Llorente? on 23:52 - May 8 with 3961 views | E20Jack |
| £50m or Gylfi and Llorente? on 23:49 - May 8 by giantstoneater |
Yes keep up we were supposed to back to playing free flowing football best thing we did was to sell those long ball merchants!! |
Not the best thing, no. But a much needed thing after being backed into a corner with very little option to turn to. Let a 15m striker walk away for free and keep a player that was refusing to play for us who both contributed to an awful style of play that scraped us survival by our collective nut sacks - or cash in and replace with players in the mould of what brought us success in the first few years. The decision is as easy now as it was then - sell.
We did the first bit right, the second part was sadly lacking. | |
| |
| £50m or Gylfi and Llorente? on 23:54 - May 8 with 3946 views | LeonWasGod |
| £50m or Gylfi and Llorente? on 23:49 - May 8 by E20Jack |
£50m no brainer.
I would have spent it better, but that is not the question is it. |
It's absolutely part of the question and why people were reluctant to see them go. Anyone who's watched us over the last x years (ever) knows that replacing talent is a lot easier said than done, and since we've been in the PL we've found it very, very hard to do.
If you consistently sell your best players and don't replace with like quality you end up where we are. Simple. See S'ton for another example, or Stoke. | | | |
| £50m or Gylfi and Llorente? on 23:56 - May 8 with 3923 views | Jonathans_coat |
| £50m or Gylfi and Llorente? on 23:11 - May 8 by peenemunde |
They weren’t replaced , big, big, big, big mistake. |
The 2 players in question were sold for 55 million, and “replaced” with 2 loan signings. Both unproven youngsters. Financial genius, sporting suicide! |  | | |
| £50m or Gylfi and Llorente? on 23:58 - May 8 with 3902 views | E20Jack |
| £50m or Gylfi and Llorente? on 23:54 - May 8 by LeonWasGod |
It's absolutely part of the question and why people were reluctant to see them go. Anyone who's watched us over the last x years (ever) knows that replacing talent is a lot easier said than done, and since we've been in the PL we've found it very, very hard to do.
If you consistently sell your best players and don't replace with like quality you end up where we are. Simple. See S'ton for another example, or Stoke. |
Nope, it is not part of the question. They are completely seperate things. We can not afford to let any 15m striker leave for nothing and we cannot afford to have a player we can get 45m for sulking on the bench refusing to play.
As upset as everyone is, it doesn’t mean common sense is thrown out of the window. We had to sell, we did sell. We then needed to replace adequately - we didn’t. | |
| |
| £50m or Gylfi and Llorente? on 23:58 - May 8 with 3900 views | Kinsey |
| £50m or Gylfi and Llorente? on 23:49 - May 8 by E20Jack |
£50m no brainer.
I would have spent it better, but that is not the question is it. |
I’d have chosen a striker whincandeliber and someone who can deliver any day over the crap that we have now.
Honestly not in the mood for your moronic justification | | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
