Was just a thought from a previous post,
It was mentioned about Rochdale taking over the Radcliffe, Wouldn't this mean Studds suffering more? and would mean closure as the stadium company couldn't afford to keep it open, and there wouldn't be any point in opening at half time for 15 or 20mins.
Instead of taking over Radcliffe why don't the board approach the stadium company and propose in sharing the profits if any!! surely that would attract more people to drink knowing the club is gaining.
And the talk of the shirts going back on wall, is there any need if people moaning about drinking in studds, there is a vast need for refurbishment ie new carpets, new ceiling updated furniture and possibly updated tv systems and sound, which all comes as a cost, and without people drinking will never happen.
Drinking in dale bar is only gaining for JW Lees, with out funds going to the up keep of the stadium there wouldnt be one. |  |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
