By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions. We in turn value your personal details in accordance with our Privacy Policy.
Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
I loved both of Celar's finishes, especially the chip... but I'm voting for Kolli as he made his goals out of less. Great to see a QPR striker seizing half chances, rather than spaffing sitters.
Went for cellar but kollis weren’t half bad either. Hard to believe we’re left with a strike force with an average age of 20 now, unless Frey is fit for Oxford .
0
Who had the better brace? on 18:24 - Dec 9 with 1256 views
Almost impossible choice as both have something special about them: Celar's both feature beautiful technique, they are gorgeous goals, plus the added drama of them being - at last - his first goals for us;
Kolli's have the wonderful exuberance of a 19-year-old seizing his chance with both hands and scoring his first goals - and they were both excellent goals. So for that reason, Kolli just shades it for me. Nice dilemmma to have!
Celars goals were both technically better. Kolli diving header was superb though, and his 2nd he kept his composure well. Not sure Armstrong would have done the same there. How many times have we seen a QPR striker flunk their lines in that situation? Four good goals.
Occasional providers of half decent House music.
1
Who had the better brace? on 13:19 - Dec 10 with 713 views
Kolli's goals packed more emotional punch somehow, but on a technical level Cellar's were in a different league. And scored under intense pressure, given his stock with fans at the time. I loved Kolli's aggressive header and also the tackle followed by driving run, but come on - on a normal day, with a functioning goalkeeper, both would have drawn fairly comfortable saves. Am still puzzled by Gunn's positioning for the header. Its not like he was a foot or two wrong. He was so far north of the centre of goal he was virtually in Neasden.
Not to take anything away from Kolli - he played with freedom and lightness when others in hoops this season have played as if lugging a bag of cement on their backs. He attacked the ball with belief, aggression and purpose, which we so rarely manage. Just asking the goalkeeper questions can garner rewards.
Jack Nicholson was once asked to explain his success with women. He pondered for a moment, then replied: "I turn up." I have often thought he should give a motivational talk to our strikers...
Jack Nicholson was once asked to explain his success with women. He pondered for a moment, then replied: "I turn up."
Off topic but disingenuous from Jack. He was a beautiful man with a sexy as hell voiice, a stunning smile, a great sense of humour and he seemed like he actually liked women. Can't see him loading the dishwasher though so not perfect husband material.
1
Who had the better brace? on 15:56 - Dec 10 with 492 views
Who had the better brace? on 14:49 - Dec 10 by Spaghetti_Hoops
Thought Celar's first was flukey. The chip was sweet.
Kolli's were part of a proper striker's performance. Much more meaningful for me.
Looking back at the extended highlights, you can see Kolli keeps his eyes on the ball the whole time for the header, he didn't need to look where the goal was, he knew. Always a good sign.
The grass is always greener.
0
Who had the better brace? on 16:04 - Dec 10 with 474 views
Who had the better brace? on 12:57 - Dec 10 by PunteR
Celars goals were both technically better. Kolli diving header was superb though, and his 2nd he kept his composure well. Not sure Armstrong would have done the same there. How many times have we seen a QPR striker flunk their lines in that situation? Four good goals.
Loved Armstrong, but if he'd scored that second, his celebration wouldn't have finished yet
1
Who had the better brace? on 16:08 - Dec 10 with 465 views
Who had the better brace? on 15:32 - Dec 10 by nix
Jack Nicholson was once asked to explain his success with women. He pondered for a moment, then replied: "I turn up."
Off topic but disingenuous from Jack. He was a beautiful man with a sexy as hell voiice, a stunning smile, a great sense of humour and he seemed like he actually liked women. Can't see him loading the dishwasher though so not perfect husband material.
Hahaha, good point, nicely expressed.
Disingenuous? I'd prefer to call it modesty, but yes, for sure, a lot more to it than turning up for Jack. Turning up does help, tho, as our recent experiences show.
When I was a teenager I was absolutely terrified of asking girls out, because I feared rejection even more than I craved the acceptance (and as a hormone-driven boy, you really DO crave acceptance). I was far older than I should have been when I realised you simply had to pose the question. Sure, you would get a certain number of knock backs. But the knock backs were rarely brutal, and you also blagged some acceptances. The older I get the more I realise I was quite stupendously stupid as a young man, all the while imagining myself to be mildly intelligent.
Anyway, this is drifting WAY off topic, for which apologies...
0
Who had the better brace? on 16:10 - Dec 10 with 455 views
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
