| Any swearing will result in a ban? 00:16 - Oct 24 with 4899 views | WalterBoyd |
Just checking.
Would ffs result in a ban ?
Would for christ's sake result in a ban ?
Would , you complete and utter banker result in a ban ?
Would you knob head result in a ban ?
Let me know which ones are ok and I will stick to those.
I recommend drawing up a list . Do's and Dont's , seriously. Everyone will know where they stand. What is swearing and what isn't ?
Could also draw up a list of opinions allowed.
What is acceptable way to dress.
What is an acceptable amount to drink
What is an acceptable amount of calories to consume in a day.
It all makes perfect sense.
FFS
|  | | |  |
| Any swearing will result in a ban? on 09:05 - Oct 25 with 1021 views | Dr_Parnassus |
| Any swearing will result in a ban? on 08:59 - Oct 25 by Treforys_Jack |
What little group is that? hope your not referring to anyone who disagrees with you. |
Of course not, I welcome people disagreeing that can verbalise why they disagree. It’s why these forums exist and what they thrive on. I have had many healthy exchanges of views on this forum.
I’m talking about the group that go around making vague insinuations and accusations, refusing to back them up all in the name of trying to muddy peoples names. Think they are clever by revealing personal bits of information they have dug up or been told by the gang and think that revealing them may give them the upper hand.
They do this because they cannot articulate why they disagree, usually because they don’t and have taken the position they have simply because others they enjoy disagreeing with, hold the other.
It’s no coincidence that they took a stance of slating a manager that was winning games consistently but then take a position to state how awful they find criticism of a manager that wins rarely. When something is so juxtaposed and as senseless as that, there is usually something behind it.
It’s simply down to agenda rather than events, and usually they are due to personal agendas.
When they get personal I love it. It means they are admitting they simply cannot compete with what you have said, plus the personal stuff doesn’t bother me either way despite how desperately they try, it gives me a distinct advantage. It’s a massive white flag as far as I’m concerned. Others may not like it however and I can certainly understand why they wouldn’t like such cowardly behaviour.
So from my perspective whenever the usual gang start to take hold of the forum, it usually declines until they are slapped into shape with a dressing down or an enforcement of the rules. Something the old board was lacking. [Post edited 25 Oct 2021 9:12]
|  |
| |
| Any swearing will result in a ban? on 09:28 - Oct 25 with 999 views | Treforys_Jack |
| Any swearing will result in a ban? on 09:05 - Oct 25 by Dr_Parnassus |
Of course not, I welcome people disagreeing that can verbalise why they disagree. It’s why these forums exist and what they thrive on. I have had many healthy exchanges of views on this forum.
I’m talking about the group that go around making vague insinuations and accusations, refusing to back them up all in the name of trying to muddy peoples names. Think they are clever by revealing personal bits of information they have dug up or been told by the gang and think that revealing them may give them the upper hand.
They do this because they cannot articulate why they disagree, usually because they don’t and have taken the position they have simply because others they enjoy disagreeing with, hold the other.
It’s no coincidence that they took a stance of slating a manager that was winning games consistently but then take a position to state how awful they find criticism of a manager that wins rarely. When something is so juxtaposed and as senseless as that, there is usually something behind it.
It’s simply down to agenda rather than events, and usually they are due to personal agendas.
When they get personal I love it. It means they are admitting they simply cannot compete with what you have said, plus the personal stuff doesn’t bother me either way despite how desperately they try, it gives me a distinct advantage. It’s a massive white flag as far as I’m concerned. Others may not like it however and I can certainly understand why they wouldn’t like such cowardly behaviour.
So from my perspective whenever the usual gang start to take hold of the forum, it usually declines until they are slapped into shape with a dressing down or an enforcement of the rules. Something the old board was lacking. [Post edited 25 Oct 2021 9:12]
|
You must have had that reply typed up ready to go, only 5mins between our posts. Totally agree with your last sentence. ðŸ‘, the rest not so much. Not seen any personal digs at yourself other than your old username, but most knew that anyway. |  | | |
| Any swearing will result in a ban? on 09:31 - Oct 25 with 967 views | onehunglow |
| Any swearing will result in a ban? on 09:28 - Oct 25 by Treforys_Jack |
You must have had that reply typed up ready to go, only 5mins between our posts. Totally agree with your last sentence. ðŸ‘, the rest not so much. Not seen any personal digs at yourself other than your old username, but most knew that anyway. |
Another example .
You really cannot see it can you Tref. | |
| |
| Any swearing will result in a ban? on 09:38 - Oct 25 with 956 views | onehunglow |
Hmm.
I feel the love.
Now all I have to do is post civil.
Got it now. I'll be watching you lumineries more closely.
I should not have used that "s" word either as I have a better vocab than that to express my opinions. That said,I can guarantee Russy's fanboys will still be all over me and others.
Prove me wrong.
I don't Martin is that good a coach.
Next... | |
| |
| Any swearing will result in a ban? on 09:57 - Oct 25 with 964 views | Dr_Parnassus |
| Any swearing will result in a ban? on 09:28 - Oct 25 by Treforys_Jack |
You must have had that reply typed up ready to go, only 5mins between our posts. Totally agree with your last sentence. ðŸ‘, the rest not so much. Not seen any personal digs at yourself other than your old username, but most knew that anyway. |
Nope, just shoot from the hip. It’s all the truth so easy to type as it comes. Nothing to disagree with, it’s all fact.
There are lots of hidden digs and revealing of personal information going on that not many will pick up on, it’s done in a covertly and cowardly way.
Been happening for months. Ugly, very ugly.
That moves on to where people live, their personal situations, family - you name it.
As I said, doesn’t bother me in the slightest. I always take it as the raising of the white flag, but I can see it for what it is and see the impact it has on the forum and the nastiness it leads to.
Makes me all the more determined to stand my ground. I have a very long memory… [Post edited 25 Oct 2021 10:00]
| |
| |
| Any swearing will result in a ban? on 10:01 - Oct 25 with 935 views | onehunglow |
| Any swearing will result in a ban? on 09:57 - Oct 25 by Dr_Parnassus |
Nope, just shoot from the hip. It’s all the truth so easy to type as it comes. Nothing to disagree with, it’s all fact.
There are lots of hidden digs and revealing of personal information going on that not many will pick up on, it’s done in a covertly and cowardly way.
Been happening for months. Ugly, very ugly.
That moves on to where people live, their personal situations, family - you name it.
As I said, doesn’t bother me in the slightest. I always take it as the raising of the white flag, but I can see it for what it is and see the impact it has on the forum and the nastiness it leads to.
Makes me all the more determined to stand my ground. I have a very long memory… [Post edited 25 Oct 2021 10:00]
|
No personal digs?
Wow.
No idea what your former username was and not really bothered.
It's good to shoot from the hip rather than to append a considered snide attack on a username.
I think you are an interesting contributor. That is all that floats my boat.
I have a niece in Australia too | |
| |
| Any swearing will result in a ban? on 12:47 - Oct 25 with 916 views | A_Fans_Dad |
| Any swearing will result in a ban? on 11:19 - Oct 24 by Catullus |
To be fair Keith, it was always going to be like herding cats but some of the cats are more intelligent than others, like Professor, some are less bright, like myself.
You just need to tie all our tails together and we'll be more manageable!
PS, I'm a Manx!! |
"some of the cats are more intelligent than others, like Professor
Which just goes to prove it has nothing to do with intelligence or education, because he is one of the worst for quickly resorting to personal abuse.
ps most kids, including girls swear and use worse words than the posters on here and most don't even appear to know they are doing it, which I find a great shame that foul language has just become an everyday part of their vocabulary. | | | |
| Any swearing will result in a ban? on 13:06 - Oct 25 with 908 views | Catullus |
| Any swearing will result in a ban? on 12:47 - Oct 25 by A_Fans_Dad |
"some of the cats are more intelligent than others, like Professor
Which just goes to prove it has nothing to do with intelligence or education, because he is one of the worst for quickly resorting to personal abuse.
ps most kids, including girls swear and use worse words than the posters on here and most don't even appear to know they are doing it, which I find a great shame that foul language has just become an everyday part of their vocabulary. |
There was a debate several years back about foul language. It turns out that people who swear are often more intelligent than some think,
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-3949986/Is-swearing-sign-intelli | |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| Any swearing will result in a ban? on 13:52 - Oct 25 with 877 views | onehunglow |
| Any swearing will result in a ban? on 12:47 - Oct 25 by A_Fans_Dad |
"some of the cats are more intelligent than others, like Professor
Which just goes to prove it has nothing to do with intelligence or education, because he is one of the worst for quickly resorting to personal abuse.
ps most kids, including girls swear and use worse words than the posters on here and most don't even appear to know they are doing it, which I find a great shame that foul language has just become an everyday part of their vocabulary. |
Swearing is also featured on ordinary telly daily. | |
| |
| Any swearing will result in a ban? on 20:43 - Oct 25 with 832 views | builthjack |
| Any swearing will result in a ban? on 10:01 - Oct 25 by onehunglow |
No personal digs?
Wow.
No idea what your former username was and not really bothered.
It's good to shoot from the hip rather than to append a considered snide attack on a username.
I think you are an interesting contributor. That is all that floats my boat.
I have a niece in Australia too |
You were most likely serving a ban when E20 was doing his stuff. |  |
| Swansea Indepenent Poster Of The Year 2021. Dr P / Mart66 / Roathie / Parlay / E20/ Duffle was 2nd, but he is deluded and thinks in his little twisted brain that he won. Poor sod. We let him win this year, as he has cried for a whole year. His 14 usernames, bless his cotton socks.
|
| |
| Any swearing will result in a ban? on 20:47 - Oct 25 with 809 views | onehunglow |
| Any swearing will result in a ban? on 20:43 - Oct 25 by builthjack |
You were most likely serving a ban when E20 was doing his stuff. |
E20.
That reminds me of E17.What a shower they were | |
| |
| Any swearing will result in a ban? on 21:28 - Oct 25 with 808 views | builthjack |
| Any swearing will result in a ban? on 20:47 - Oct 25 by onehunglow |
E20.
That reminds me of E17.What a shower they were |
Adam has been banned more times than you. Fact. | |
| Swansea Indepenent Poster Of The Year 2021. Dr P / Mart66 / Roathie / Parlay / E20/ Duffle was 2nd, but he is deluded and thinks in his little twisted brain that he won. Poor sod. We let him win this year, as he has cried for a whole year. His 14 usernames, bless his cotton socks.
|
| |
| Any swearing will result in a ban? on 21:33 - Oct 25 with 799 views | Dr_Parnassus |
Once my good sir, for questioning the Trust.
Views I still hold today.
As you were sweetheart. | |
| |
| Any swearing will result in a ban? on 21:36 - Oct 25 with 799 views | builthjack |
| Any swearing will result in a ban? on 21:33 - Oct 25 by Dr_Parnassus |
Once my good sir, for questioning the Trust.
Views I still hold today.
As you were sweetheart. |
You were changing your username more often than Cardiff are conceding goals.
Sumbler was banning you, so you were putting a new user name up. Sometimes 5 or 6 a day.
It was quite funny actually. The buggers couldn't stop you. | |
| Swansea Indepenent Poster Of The Year 2021. Dr P / Mart66 / Roathie / Parlay / E20/ Duffle was 2nd, but he is deluded and thinks in his little twisted brain that he won. Poor sod. We let him win this year, as he has cried for a whole year. His 14 usernames, bless his cotton socks.
|
| |
| Any swearing will result in a ban? on 21:43 - Oct 25 with 793 views | Dr_Parnassus |
| Any swearing will result in a ban? on 21:36 - Oct 25 by builthjack |
You were changing your username more often than Cardiff are conceding goals.
Sumbler was banning you, so you were putting a new user name up. Sometimes 5 or 6 a day.
It was quite funny actually. The buggers couldn't stop you. |
Well yes but that was all from the same incident of correctly questioning the Trust.
I have only had a banning once, which was completely ridiculous and unjustified, along with chad and another who's name escapes me. We were both banned every time we signed back up to respond to how ridiculous the ban was.
Thats why the owner of the main Swans forum should not be the Chair of the supporters Trust, it is a huge conflict of interests as he was able to shape the views of the fans and was able to do such things as pass the vote to take the American deal with less opposition. They realised we were correct eventually, no apology though and Chad was lied to in person along with her husband regarding the bans.
Thankfully no signs of such ridiculous forum behavior from the owners this time. | |
| |
| Any swearing will result in a ban? on 21:48 - Oct 25 with 792 views | builthjack |
| Any swearing will result in a ban? on 21:43 - Oct 25 by Dr_Parnassus |
Well yes but that was all from the same incident of correctly questioning the Trust.
I have only had a banning once, which was completely ridiculous and unjustified, along with chad and another who's name escapes me. We were both banned every time we signed back up to respond to how ridiculous the ban was.
Thats why the owner of the main Swans forum should not be the Chair of the supporters Trust, it is a huge conflict of interests as he was able to shape the views of the fans and was able to do such things as pass the vote to take the American deal with less opposition. They realised we were correct eventually, no apology though and Chad was lied to in person along with her husband regarding the bans.
Thankfully no signs of such ridiculous forum behavior from the owners this time. |
Just don't swear. Which shouldn't be hard for anyone really. | |
| Swansea Indepenent Poster Of The Year 2021. Dr P / Mart66 / Roathie / Parlay / E20/ Duffle was 2nd, but he is deluded and thinks in his little twisted brain that he won. Poor sod. We let him win this year, as he has cried for a whole year. His 14 usernames, bless his cotton socks.
|
| |
| Any swearing will result in a ban? on 21:49 - Oct 25 with 787 views | Dr_Parnassus |
| Any swearing will result in a ban? on 21:48 - Oct 25 by builthjack |
Just don't swear. Which shouldn't be hard for anyone really. |
Have I then? | |
| |
| Any swearing will result in a ban? on 22:13 - Oct 25 with 777 views | ReslovenSwan1 |
| Any swearing will result in a ban? on 21:43 - Oct 25 by Dr_Parnassus |
Well yes but that was all from the same incident of correctly questioning the Trust.
I have only had a banning once, which was completely ridiculous and unjustified, along with chad and another who's name escapes me. We were both banned every time we signed back up to respond to how ridiculous the ban was.
Thats why the owner of the main Swans forum should not be the Chair of the supporters Trust, it is a huge conflict of interests as he was able to shape the views of the fans and was able to do such things as pass the vote to take the American deal with less opposition. They realised we were correct eventually, no apology though and Chad was lied to in person along with her husband regarding the bans.
Thankfully no signs of such ridiculous forum behavior from the owners this time. |
It is to your great credit that you questions the SCST leadership and strategy. Too few people have done this. Their strategy of getting to 25% was dreamland being around £4,000,000 short with no significant income. (or £3,000 - £4,000 per member). Its a bit like the Liberal Party. You can have a policy but never actually have any chance of enacting it.
I however believe they should have accepted the £5m offer for 5% if it is their intention to leave the club and ideally signed a 'tag on' agreement if that was on offer for their shares at the same price the other shareholders get. (not the 2016 price).
I believe the £5m even without a tag on would have made more sense than the legal route. £5m plus the current market value of the club would conceivably see them get close to the return they would get from a 100% win in court.
Assume the club is worth $45m. 15% of that is £6.75m plus £5m = £11.75m
If there are 40% costs (commonly associated with these cases) 60% of £21m is £12.6m. If the costs are 45% that drops to £11.55m.
Inflation in football sees the club valuation increase year on year providing the club is not relegated. |  |
| |
| Any swearing will result in a ban? on 22:32 - Oct 25 with 760 views | KeithHaynes |
| Any swearing will result in a ban? on 13:52 - Oct 25 by onehunglow |
Swearing is also featured on ordinary telly daily. |
But not on here when kids are reading it. |  |
| |
| Any swearing will result in a ban? on 22:43 - Oct 25 with 748 views | Chief |
| Any swearing will result in a ban? on 22:13 - Oct 25 by ReslovenSwan1 |
It is to your great credit that you questions the SCST leadership and strategy. Too few people have done this. Their strategy of getting to 25% was dreamland being around £4,000,000 short with no significant income. (or £3,000 - £4,000 per member). Its a bit like the Liberal Party. You can have a policy but never actually have any chance of enacting it.
I however believe they should have accepted the £5m offer for 5% if it is their intention to leave the club and ideally signed a 'tag on' agreement if that was on offer for their shares at the same price the other shareholders get. (not the 2016 price).
I believe the £5m even without a tag on would have made more sense than the legal route. £5m plus the current market value of the club would conceivably see them get close to the return they would get from a 100% win in court.
Assume the club is worth $45m. 15% of that is £6.75m plus £5m = £11.75m
If there are 40% costs (commonly associated with these cases) 60% of £21m is £12.6m. If the costs are 45% that drops to £11.55m.
Inflation in football sees the club valuation increase year on year providing the club is not relegated. |
Nice shoehorning of your propaganda into another thread that has nothing to do with the topic, but as per usual I feel compelled not let this go unscrutinized, so here we go....
I welcome questioning the trust, prevents complacency. However it should be done in a balanced manner which you seem incapable of doing. Why have suddenly just jumped onto the 25% issue? Bizarre writing. Well it's a fantastic goal to aim for is it not??? If the trust didn't have aspirations of reaching 25% or more they'd be doing the members a disservice. They have gained a few % here and there in the past by the way.
Not entirely sure what use 5mill would be in the grand scheme of things? Some property maybe but how long would take to reap actual rewards. I see your point on that but ultimately probably not a lot of benefit in it.
A tag on agreement you say? Some form of agreement between shareholders? A shareholders agreement if you will? Hmm where have I heard that before? Sounds familiar.
Close to, but not as much?
Why are you pretending again that costs won't be put on the losers? (commonly associated with these cases).
It may well do, but it will take a long time to climb back up to what the shares were worth at the time of the sale. And that's if a buyer can be found, which evidently isn't an easy task. As you know but refuse to acknowledge. |  |
| |
| Any swearing will result in a ban? on 23:08 - Oct 25 with 729 views | ReslovenSwan1 |
| Any swearing will result in a ban? on 22:43 - Oct 25 by Chief |
Nice shoehorning of your propaganda into another thread that has nothing to do with the topic, but as per usual I feel compelled not let this go unscrutinized, so here we go....
I welcome questioning the trust, prevents complacency. However it should be done in a balanced manner which you seem incapable of doing. Why have suddenly just jumped onto the 25% issue? Bizarre writing. Well it's a fantastic goal to aim for is it not??? If the trust didn't have aspirations of reaching 25% or more they'd be doing the members a disservice. They have gained a few % here and there in the past by the way.
Not entirely sure what use 5mill would be in the grand scheme of things? Some property maybe but how long would take to reap actual rewards. I see your point on that but ultimately probably not a lot of benefit in it.
A tag on agreement you say? Some form of agreement between shareholders? A shareholders agreement if you will? Hmm where have I heard that before? Sounds familiar.
Close to, but not as much?
Why are you pretending again that costs won't be put on the losers? (commonly associated with these cases).
It may well do, but it will take a long time to climb back up to what the shares were worth at the time of the sale. And that's if a buyer can be found, which evidently isn't an easy task. As you know but refuse to acknowledge. |
The best people to find a buyer is the US people especially Mr Kaplan. His company holds huge assets in many companies running into hundreds of billions. A good man to stay on friendly terms with I suggest. He even took time to mix with the good people of Swansea in 2016.
Hopefully the new board will take a new non confrontational approach and start networking. The signs are promising. | |
| |
| Any swearing will result in a ban? on 23:27 - Oct 25 with 714 views | WalterBoyd |
| Any swearing will result in a ban? on 21:57 - Oct 24 by raynor94 |
Yet you called Russell Martin a shytehouse within a month of him arriving |
Swear alot after a few ? | | | |
| Any swearing will result in a ban? on 00:32 - Oct 26 with 681 views | KeithHaynes |
Thread closed. Mission accomplished. | |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
