By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions. We in turn value your personal details in accordance with our Privacy Policy.
Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
Well that is what i have have always thought unless somebody says differently..
In that case I respectfuly think that you need to brush up a little on UK company law. The debt from his companies have not been accrued in his name because they are limited companies. The debts have been accrued in their name and the majority of his different limited companies have a maximum liability of £10 , being their authorised share capital. When I last looked them up soon after he had started at Bury the issued capital was I think £3 which is the most he personally stands to lose as a share holder.
In that case I respectfuly think that you need to brush up a little on UK company law. The debt from his companies have not been accrued in his name because they are limited companies. The debts have been accrued in their name and the majority of his different limited companies have a maximum liability of £10 , being their authorised share capital. When I last looked them up soon after he had started at Bury the issued capital was I think £3 which is the most he personally stands to lose as a share holder.
Thanks for that info..
My all time favourite Dale player Mr Lyndon Symmonds