By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions. We in turn value your personal details in accordance with our Privacy Policy.
Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
nigel thanks you for your vote holloway, please join him , myself and other like minded individuals for a meet in the countryside where we can discuss the final solution for islington labour mp's.
One suggestion i propose is to make them live in east ham/upton park/plaistow /forest gate for 12 months and actually live among the people they purport to support while taking jemima khan, sir ian mckellan, emma thompson , lilly allen ,eddie izard and their colonic irrigation practitioner off their speed dial.(Those fair trade alfafa grape nuts are a such a burden to pass in a single bowel movement)
leave your note book at home though mate.
ive also booked victoria ayling the fem dom ukip candiadte for grimsby , for gentlemans relish later in the evening, she's showcasing harriet harmans husbands gonzo porno film while using kitty usher as a dildo.we'll be releasing clare short and mark duggan into the wild to mate , then we'll hunt them for their skins to be made into a rug for vigorous hustings of rent boys in front of fire at party HQ.
Fu ck me, the Alan 'fluff' freeman Of politics.
tourettes suffering ,triangle blue pill popping worzel gummidge in a saville row chalk stripe. The Madame Cynthia Payne of the Lib Dems.
Do us all a favour Paddy and get the 'art of self deliverance' Out from your local library you daft old bifter. Dont worry about the late charges on the book , i'll take care of it. Now fck off you daft old craggy cnt. oh look , your tourettes is catching.
A split in the family here. Wifey continues as a conservative but I could not bring myself to vote for son of Douglas Hurd who is a pale shadow of his father. My postal vote went to UKIP for their policies, not the MP. Hopefully they can push Cameron into some form of 'coalition' and ensure a quick exit from Europe and a rapid closure of the open borders policy. I don't really believe it but pretty well anything would be better than Millipede and Ballsup as puppets of the Scottish cow.
Most likely government in my opinion is another Conservative/Liberal/ukip coalition with Nigel throwing a strop within three months and another election taking place.
[Post edited 27 Apr 2015 9:27]
Currently residing in Pinner, Centre of the Universe.
I voted UKIP in the Euro elections but wasn't going to vote for them in this. However, it really annoys me that so many people don't 'get' or won't admit to 'getting' what UKIP is really saying. Ok if you don't agree with them, but get the point and deal with the point, don't just dismiss them as a load of barmy racists, because they make a valid point. If somebody else was making a more valid point about anything much at all then I'd vote for them, but it's a pretty bare cupboard I'm afraid.
As for the SNP leader, half the people that I speak to don't even realise that she's not standing for election at all. And of the party leaders only Cameron and Ed are guaranteed to get in. The rest of them are either not standing for election, have a good chance of losing in their seat or have no chance at all of wining a seat. So who will end up leading the alternatives to the big 2 in the House of commons is a question that hasn't been asked very often.
The other question that I don't understand is if say the Tories win the most seats and even with the Libs and DUP they don't have a majority, but they have far more seats than Labour on their own, then can Labour employ the SNP to get them into government? And if they do then what happens on the Commons votes upon which the SNP feels unable to vote as they are purely 'English' issues? Will the Tory alliance potentially beat Labour on all of those non-SNP votes, or even some of them? It seems a recipe for total chaos.
I voted UKIP in the Euro elections but wasn't going to vote for them in this. However, it really annoys me that so many people don't 'get' or won't admit to 'getting' what UKIP is really saying. Ok if you don't agree with them, but get the point and deal with the point, don't just dismiss them as a load of barmy racists, because they make a valid point. If somebody else was making a more valid point about anything much at all then I'd vote for them, but it's a pretty bare cupboard I'm afraid.
As for the SNP leader, half the people that I speak to don't even realise that she's not standing for election at all. And of the party leaders only Cameron and Ed are guaranteed to get in. The rest of them are either not standing for election, have a good chance of losing in their seat or have no chance at all of wining a seat. So who will end up leading the alternatives to the big 2 in the House of commons is a question that hasn't been asked very often.
The other question that I don't understand is if say the Tories win the most seats and even with the Libs and DUP they don't have a majority, but they have far more seats than Labour on their own, then can Labour employ the SNP to get them into government? And if they do then what happens on the Commons votes upon which the SNP feels unable to vote as they are purely 'English' issues? Will the Tory alliance potentially beat Labour on all of those non-SNP votes, or even some of them? It seems a recipe for total chaos.
[Post edited 27 Apr 2015 9:43]
The SNP have said they won't support the Tories so that scenario won't happen.
Had a knock on the door Saturday, it was my local UKIP council candidate. Answered all my questions honestly, explained their aims and policy's without any BS or flannel, they're getting my vote.
favourite cheese mature Cheddar. FFS there is no such thing as the EPL
Had a knock on the door Saturday, it was my local UKIP council candidate. Answered all my questions honestly, explained their aims and policy's without any BS or flannel, they're getting my vote.
good man loft boy, how are your ears by the way, had a good laugh about your trip to the turkish barbers..
wasnt to happy about the frankie sutherland rumor though.if he's allowed to go to west ham it really does demonstrate we have learned fk all under fernandes.
I still don't understand why ukip get so much support, the only policy they seem to have is get rid of the foreigners but it's working well for them
Maybe some people are using UKIP as a protest vote?
As there is no "none of the above" option to register your dissatisfaction so anyone who doesn't vote because they don't like any of the options, as opposed to just not giving a damn, is a lost opportunity to say so.
So, maybe by voting for UKIP it's also a way of saying to the mainstream parties "get your fking fingers out and actually listen to what people want” (not necessarily UKIP policies, they’re just the conduit).
good man loft boy, how are your ears by the way, had a good laugh about your trip to the turkish barbers..
wasnt to happy about the frankie sutherland rumor though.if he's allowed to go to west ham it really does demonstrate we have learned fk all under fernandes.
It was the most weirdest thing I've done! But got a bloody good shave for a tenner!
favourite cheese mature Cheddar. FFS there is no such thing as the EPL
The whole plan seems to be to cut immigration which is fine but they don't seem to have anything else. On the NHS it's about treating less immigrants to allow Brits to get seen, on finances it's give less money to foreign aid, all seems to be the same thing. I think they'll be a disaster but are going to get a lot of votes as immigration is a major topic that none of the other parties seem to be dealing with very well.
The whole plan seems to be to cut immigration which is fine but they don't seem to have anything else. On the NHS it's about treating less immigrants to allow Brits to get seen, on finances it's give less money to foreign aid, all seems to be the same thing. I think they'll be a disaster but are going to get a lot of votes as immigration is a major topic that none of the other parties seem to be dealing with very well.
It hardly seems worth arguing about - such a load of rubbish being spouted off all the time.
But you can hardly be a disaster with half a dozen MPs and i don't think that many people are voting for them as a government in waiting, but on immigration they are quite clearly raising issues which concern many people and which no other party wants to tackle.
For instance the other parties talk about the NHS 'budget' and more spending. Well there is actaully no proper budget for anything. A proper budget would start with some sort of estimate of population, working population, numbers requiring education and health care and so on. Then you put amounts into those numbers in terms of income and expenditure. The more people you have the more income you have and the more expenditure you have on different things, depending on the projections. That's a proper budget. This lot are just plucking figures from the sky and they don't fit into anything that resembles any sort of budget at all. For a start they'd have to predict population growth and nobody wants to do that of course, so they just chuck numbers around and hit and hope or whatever they feel like talking shite about on the day.
The whole plan seems to be to cut immigration which is fine but they don't seem to have anything else. On the NHS it's about treating less immigrants to allow Brits to get seen, on finances it's give less money to foreign aid, all seems to be the same thing. I think they'll be a disaster but are going to get a lot of votes as immigration is a major topic that none of the other parties seem to be dealing with very well.
They may well get a lot of votes (BBC Poll of Polls currently has them on 16%), but they are unlikely to get many - if any - seats. http://www.electionforecast.co.uk/ has them on one, and that's an incumbent Tory defection, other predictions I've seen have them on three. That's how first past the post does it. So, Pomanjou's prediction of UKIP having any weight in any coalition, much less a Farridge strop causing a new election, seems unlikely.
I've always believed that first past the post lead to clear cut government and PR a mish-mash. But now, if we are not going to get clear majorities, then PR would lead to a much fairer representation of the people in any coalition. That notwithstanding, if FPTP keeps NF (pun intended) and his brigade from having 16% of a say, I remain in favour.
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
