Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
Daily Echo Hint At Player Power Issues In Southampton Squad
Tuesday, 6th Jan 2026 10:01

In a surprise post on social media platform X The Daily Echo's Saints reporter Alfie House made a very cryptic statement about the Southampton squad, hinting at a division in the dressing room.

Earlier in the season a rumour did the rounds that a Championship club captain had took the unprecedented step of going to his club's board and complaining about the manager and his methods, their were many Saints fans who claimed that Southampton FC that was the club in question.

When Will Still was sacked a few weeks later, that only fuelled this rumour.

Initially after the success of Tonda Eckert it seemed that the corner had been turned and that all was united in the St Mary's dressing room, that the club's players were all behind Tonda Eckert.

However recent results have suggested otherwise and the appalling collapse at Middlesbrough shows a complete lack of leadership on the pitch, although Tonda Eckert's selections of late of certain players and positions had looked strange.

So yesterday's social media post from Alfie House has opened a can of worms, the Echo reporter had this to say.

"In an ideal summer 2026, I'd enthusiastically keep Charles, Jander, Fellows, Azaz, Scienza, Robinson and Armstrong. I'd hang on to Quarshie, Edwards and Wood. Roerslev if fit. I think I'd replace everyone else. Complete culture reset. Probably impossible though."

Very strange sentiments with the very cryptic statement at the end about a "Complete Reset"

Whilst I would say that this was probably not a comprehensive list of those that House would keep, that there would have been a few omissions, mainly youngsters like Cameron Bragg & other fringe players, but it was the number of senior players missing from that list that was surprising.

Taylor Harwood-Bellis, Jack Stephens, Flynn Downes, Ryan Manning, all mainstays of the promotion side of two years ago are significantly not named in the list.

The inference from Alfie House is that there is a culture issue, a clique of players who are running their own agendas.

Interestingly enough I had heard something similar last week, although not from someone who is within the club or had spoken to a player first hand, so not from the horses mouth so to speak, but I was told that there was clique of players that had loved working under Russell Martin, they loved his training methods, days off etc.

My source also claimed he has been told that this clique is only interested in playing the Russell Martin way as it is less physically demanding. That since his departure they are only interested in going through the motions and know that whilst they remain in the Championship, they will remain Saints players.

Amazingly they went on to say that these players had only put in the effort to get Tonda Eckert the job, as they think they can manipulate and influence him and that having got Saints into a mid table position and Eckert the job, they are now just going through the motions.

When I heard that last week, I have to admit I was very sceptical, perhaps I am naïve, but I thought that we had an honest set of players and that whatever gripes they may have, they would put in the effort when on the pitch.

I also had to balance up where this was coming from, as It was not from a usual source and I prefer to only publish things that I can see have substance.

However Alfie House's revelation seems to be backing up the information I was given last week, although so far at least House himself hasn't written a full piece in the Daily Echo backing up his claims on X with more substance.

I have said this on more than one occasion, when rumours abound about the club, those that cover it for the local media ie The Daily Echo & the BBC South etc usually have a good handle on it, they have the inside contacts, they will be given snippets from those within the club that they want put out.

Sometimes that comes from players who want away or have a gripe and sometimes it is from within those running the club.

So for Alfie House to put something like this out on X is either because he is being briefed by the club, in which case they will sit back or this is something that they do want public and if that is the case, House is on very stony ground, he would find it difficult to get access to the club in the future and worse still, he and the paper could be banned from covering the club's matches, at least officially, this has happened before, the last time under Nicola Cortese.

So at the moment the source that has lead House to do so is unclear, it could be:

A. Johannes Spors and his board, who can see what is happening and want to set the scene for Eckert to revamp the squad and clear out those that are counter productive.

Likewise they want someone neutral to reveal that the issues we have are not just about Sport Republic or the Managers tactics.

If this is the case then the club will sit back and say little perhaps even nothing.

B. It is coming from someone in the camp who is not part of this so called clique and wants this to be known, however if this is the case, House is on dodgy ground with the club, but perhaps not too dodgy.

C. House is working from rumours and doesn't feel confident enough to put his name to an article, he is just throwing hand grenades out there to see what happens.

This is the extremely dodgy ground for House and I don't believe that he would do this without some substance.

I think that the most likely scenario is A, that House has been briefed by the club, he has opted for a soft landing via X, so it looks like he is working from info from someone within the club, but not the board.

Sport Republic are not very popular at the moment, he and does not want to be seen as a patsy for the club and for that matter the club would not want to be seen as mounting a PR campaign.

This is not a criticism of Alfie House, this is how it works as the local hack covering a football club, it is important to maintain a good relationship with the club you are covering, yes sometimes you have to put out something the club doesn't like, but in the main you have to tread a fine line.

You slag off a player in print and you could find yourselves blanked by the whole squad, you slag off the club you could get banned, worst scenario the club doesn't ban the local paper, it just bans you as an individual, then you are at danger of being moved from your job on covering Saints and to another area in the paper, losing a great little job.

So as I say, I think House is getting briefed here by the club, if he isn't then he is going to be persona non gratis around St Mary's not just from the manager & club hierarchy, but the squad itself.

The problem for Southampton FC is that this is not an issue that they can sort out this season, those players mentioned who were not on House's keep at the club list, are all on good contracts that they would not get elsewhere, they are not going anywhere.

The scene is being set that Tonda Eckert has to make drastic changes to weed out those who are counter productive, but they can't be shifted out this transfer window, I would not be surprised to see some surprise omissions from the squad against Doncaster, but not just that fixture but also for the subsequent games after that.

We will see how the club reacts, we will see how the manager reacts and we will see how certain players react.

But make no bones about this social media post, the message is that the squad is being run by certain players, that needs to change and the manager and club are going to deal with it, but that will probably cost us promotion this season, but better to do it now that let it fester any longer.

All Photos Via Reuters



Please report offensive, libellous or inappropriate posts by using the links provided.



davidargyll added 10:36 - Jan 6
Yes i read this but it now seems to have been taken down from the Echo website.
I recently came to the conclusion that the players needed a good kicking and that TE was not the man to do it and certainly this would seem to at least partially support that view, ie player power vs manager.
As you say it all sounds pretty informed and the one thing one does know is that these things never end happily.
Interesting therefore that Garner has been appointed at what would appear to be a decisive time, of whom I see from Wikipedia that Ricky Lambert, sometime of this parish, speaks highly…
3

abrowne53 added 11:30 - Jan 6
What Alfie implies makes sense, but is it really the RM brigade who are manipulating the terrible tactics of tippy tappy football and 3 centre backs? Surely the two manager/coaches this season choose the back 3 / 2 wingback formation so the CBs are inclined to play safely sideways until eventually the midfielders have to play risky balls forward often intercepted…

Clearly, however, most of the players from the last disastrous season have PTSD and Alfie is right they should be cleared out, maybe not from the club yet due to contracts, but certainly from the team.

The key is to find a 2 CB pairing, by process of elimination it’s Edwards and Quarshie, although Harwood-Bellis has been the most aggressive and consistent defender this season so I would make him the exception (and captain) and the tall, young, strong Quarshie can sub in and continue to learn his trade.

Fullbacks - Jelert is good but too small long term, the lack of height and physicality must be addressed in the next transfer window and strong, athletic, tall full backs brought in to a back 4 - goodbye Manning and Welington.

Charles, Jander, Bragg, Azaz are good combinations in midfield, Fellows, Scienza, Robinson also good options on the wings, AA good but we must have a great CF, think Lambert, Pelle, Ings quality.

Lastly let’s hope the new GK Peretz comes in, commands his box (he’s 6’4”), that would certainly counter the reason for the extra defender it appears we’ve been forced to play, but hope he also saves some low shots!

So only three new signings needed IMO, 2 fullbacks and a centre forward - break the bank for the latter!
5

Colburn added 12:23 - Jan 6
The culture he may be referring to might be the losing culture and ability to play a different style, it may not allude to a split in the camp, so I would be careful with how his comments are interpreted because as someone who is not in the know, I pretty much share his opinion about his post in the way I interpret it. I’m not sure I would keep Armstrong out of his list but would keep Welington as we’ve never seen him have a proper run in the team and be able to settle but I’m not hopeful where he’s concerned either. I would also let Wood go.
Wouldn’t be surprised if there was a split in the camp though and this was a big hint from the hack representative..
0

Jesus_02 added 12:25 - Jan 6
Alfie could have been refering to any culture really, we hae a loosing culture, we have a cutlur that collapses when things go wrong and we have a culture that reverts to playing a specific way when under pressure. We also have a fan lead culture of blaiming Russel Martin four managers on. As soon as things go wrong its like we have a collective trauma of the manager that actualy got us promoted!

If you want to believe in conspiracies believe that the Premier League just didnt want us clogging up Sky TV. Look at the 1st 8 gmes and how many points we dropped through didgy VAR decisions. Look at how soon (2nd Match Ithink) Sky pundits were saying we wouldnt beat Derbys total. Then think do Sky want to be televising a team that dominates possession and does little with it. Thats a decent conspiricy!
-4

saintmark1976 added 12:28 - Jan 6
I refer the honourable member ie yourself Nick, to point number 3.of my contribution to your latest match report. The comment was made before the Alfie House story broke.

I suggest that it’s been clear for weeks that certain players fancy drawing salaries us mere mortals can only dream about, whilst giving less than 100% playing “ easy street “ football in the middle of The Championship.

By not including them in his list of players the club need to keep House has identified who they are and if he is correct then frankly they should be ashamed of themselves.

9

Bowlercow added 12:41 - Jan 6
I posted after Tondas 5th or 6th game that I believed senior players were dictating the style of play to a young inexperienced coach And I have stood by it subsequently.
I know many didn't like the tippy happy under RM.but it worked and got us promoted.
The difference then is that the whole team played that style Now it's just the keeper,Stevens,THB,Manning and Downes They are the same players who were an automatic choice under RM
I remember posts on here criticising their selection at different times A new position was even created for Stevens who is still IMO our worst player
Spors as DoF should be all over this and laying down the law
6

kingolaf added 12:45 - Jan 6
I agree that there is a poisonous element in the dressing room.

Drop Bazunu, Stephens, Wood, Harwood-Bellis, Manning, Downes and Armstrong. They probably haven’t had their shirts washed in weeks as they don’t break a sweat. I’m sure they are the culprits.
Put in the new keeper, Edwards, Quarshie, Welington, Charles and Stewart (or ideally a new striker).

Eckert needs to be strong or these arseholes will cost him his job at the end of the season.
11

SaintPaulVW added 13:20 - Jan 6
Even a B team with a few academy players should be strong enough to put up a good showing in the Championship.

As manager, Tonda needs to be backed to make the changes he wants to and to implement the system he wants.After all, it's his head on the results block.

THB and Downes really aren't a patch on the players they were 2 seasons ago. Manning was good last year but has gone downhill this year. No idea why Stephens was offered a 3 year contract unless it was dirt cheap.

Also I really cannot think of another team that has to regularly rotate goalkeepers due to each one giving poor performances. This needs to be resolved ASAP.
4

StRipper added 13:54 - Jan 6
A few circumstantial observations I have.
I wonder if In light of this, it was notable that it was Harwood Bellis that made the initial comments to Lampard that kicked off the fracas in our home draw with Coventry. I can't believe that Eckert would have approved of THB going up to Lampard and having a dig at him about the sending off tackle on Wellington. So maybe even evidence there that some of those players are laws unto themselves.
It was also interesting that Downes was the one who bit to the heckling from one fan in the Northam end during a corner at the Millwall match. The heckle was about our lack of forward passing. Both THB and Downes laughed initially, then when the fan followed up to question again why we don't pass forward more, Downes then told the fan to "f8ck off". 6 of one, half a dozen of another I know. But more indications of some players seeming to think they are on a different level.
And maybe a stretch, but I wonder if thats also why Wood did the unthinkable too and abused Saints fans in the Preston loss. Has he been taking his worldview too much from the clique that he spends most of his time with?
1

OoohTerryHurlock added 13:55 - Jan 6
I’d be inclined to agree with Alfie House on this occasion. I’d also get shot of THB, Jack Stephens, Manning and Downes. I’d also let Bazunu go and find himself another club at the end of the season, release McCarthy, Frazer, Aribo and anyone else who doesn’t want to play for the badge.
8

OoohTerryHurlock added 13:58 - Jan 6
I read it slightly wrong. Anyway, those are the ones I’d like to get rid of.
1

halftimeorange added 14:09 - Jan 6
Why did that brief spell we had at the onset of Tonda's reign suddenly come to an end? It seemed to happen at half-time in the Leicester game at the end of November. We led 3-0 and then ceased to press, almost as though we'd run out of ideas and agreed with Leicester that it wasn't worth making a continued attacking effort in part two. Certainly, we achieved a couple more results against B'ham and WBA but, instead of Scienza, Azaz, Armstrong and Fellows (when fit) completely running unpredictable riot, by half-time in those games we had, apparently run out of steam. Why? Personally, I think Tonda had by then started thinking about what he wanted, until then our four protagonists had done what they fancied doing and Tonda's lack of interference was acknowledged in post-match interviews. A more gradual attack policy was in place and to the detriment of our less than robust defence who reverted to type i.e., passing backwards and sideways in a crab-like style. This reduction of pace and eccentricity has played into even the weakest of opposition hands. I think it might be that Tonda's direction has nullified our effectiveness, the players with pace and an eye for goal should be given their heads.
2

d_ember added 14:51 - Jan 6
I have been saying this since Martin was sacked. Juric is a competent Manager and could not get a tune out of them, Still had earned his chance at this level and beyond and I wonder if the in/out nature of Stephens does not suggest more than just rest, and he is infact the leader of said clique.
5

IanRC added 17:28 - Jan 6
Does anyone have any idea why Ronnie Edwards is completely ignored when dross like Stephens and Manning are selected ?
3

WestSussexSaint added 19:17 - Jan 6
I think there is some substance in Alfie’s cryptic message and Nick’s musings, even it they and we don’t, and can’t, know the whole truth. No smoke without fire…..

If you look for comparisons then there are plenty of connections with Man Utd. A few long standing senior players who rule the dressing room, a succession of bright managers who cannot get a tune out of the team, a boardroom without clear direction or accountability. And United have been in this place for a decade!
1

underweststand added 10:54 - Jan 7
Must admit that I am always doubtful about the effect that journalists can have on fans and even the manager's future and even his own choice of players. I think as a relative "new boy" in the media world, reporting on Saints, that Alfie comes over as a fairly good journo', and can write well, but (unlike other fans) his personal viewpoint seems to carry far more weight than the rest of us, simply because he has a wider readership. I don't regard him as the oracle in the football world (anymore than former players who get dragged on to the TV to give their "expert" opinion). Given that TE had such a great start suggests he knows enough to get victories, whilst working with the same squad that the unfortunate Will Still had when he started in the summer. Half a dozen poor performances is not necessarily grounds for automatically sacking the manager.
If blame is to be placed, it must surely go to those who go out to play every game and their attitude and that no team has the " Divine Right " to win every game. There are still a few very good teams out there and if we play badly, we (maybe) deserve to get punished.

My overall opinion is that some of the present players aren't good enough for this league - let alone the thought of us getting back upto the Prem. So whilst it's Tonda's job to find that winning formula again, there are a few (very well-paid) players who need to take a good look in the mirror before they run out onto the pitch every week.
Drastic criticism from the likes of Alfie (and a few others) does little to help calm the storm and get us return us to winning ways.
0

bryanK added 12:56 - Jan 7
For us older fans the rumour during Ted Bates time was that Painey picked the team. That was OK if there was any truth in the rumour as during Terry Paine’s time we did OK and he was worshipped by the majority of us. McMenemy decided 2 strong people would not work and as manager he was brave enough to do the unthinkable and offload him. Which was not popular. Two years later we won the cup.
Cannot see anybody within Sports Republic or this inexperienced Manager being brave enough to deal with this alleged situation.
I’m sure a Neil Warnock would know ho to deal with the tippy tappy lazy players who in my view are going a long way to destroying my beloved club.
3


You need to login in order to post your comments

Blogs 31 bloggers

Southampton Polls

About Us Contact Us Terms & Conditions Privacy Cookies Online Safety Advertising
© FansNetwork 2026